overlaylink

The Psychology of Focus

Concetta Cucchiarelli
July 08, 2024 | 5 min read

This article explores the fascinating workings of the focus and attention systems in the brain. Knowing more about your brain's own processes can help make you more productive — and more creatively fulfilled.

Psychology started studying attention to find out how people can stay alert. But after many years, we now understand that attention and focus are the most hidden and powerful systems we have in the brain, the directors of all our thoughts and actions.

Once you more fully understand the complexity of the psychological processes that make you act the way we do, you can address and nurture all these processes to find harmony and balance in your activities. 

In this article, you'll learn:

Attention & Focus

When we speak about attention and focus, we often do so as if they were the same thing. But they're not.

We tend to think about attention as the place where we place our focus and, conversely, focus as what we pay attention to. But let's go deeper. To use an analogy, it's like shooting a video:

"Attention" is like framing a shot, while "focus" is more like pressing the record button. By pressing record, we choose to filter out all the alternative possibilities around that frame, and we commit to staying there for a bit, blurring the background.

Second, there are different kinds of attention, like selective, sustained, and divided. When we talk about attention, we commonly think only about the ability to stay focused on a task for an extended period of time. We tend to believe that this is the only function of attention, and all the rest are distractions to avoid.

But the attention system is way more intricate.

If we had just the ability to focus on something, we would be locked in a task every time we intentionally engaged in something, missing other, more relevant or important, information being passed along by our mind, our body, or our environment. All of that information is vital for our safety and survival!

The type of attention we think of most often is called "top-down." It drives voluntary attention, willpower, and intentional choices, and occurs in the neocortex, a more recently developed area of the brain. 

Here's how it works practically: We intentionally decide to pay attention to something — for example, to read an article — and we deliberately move our focus to the page.

But if your phone vibrates or the doorbell rings, our intentionality is immediately hijacked by a different kind of mechanism called "bottom-up." This mechanism allows us to stay open and connected to all the information coming into our brain that is different from the task at hand. This mode occurs in subcortical circuitry in the lower and more ancient part of the brain.

This switch is possible at all because of another actor in the attention system called the attentional filter. The attentional filter is a system of neurons constantly monitoring the environment and selecting what is worth bringing to the conscious level. We could think about it as the director in the same analogy of shooting a video — they decide what's worth framing in the first place.

The role of the attentional filter is vital to keeping us safe and from getting overwhelmed by the amount of information available to our brains at all times.

And perhaps the most important thing to remember: We may think that the majority of our mental operations happen intentionally, in top-down mode, but in fact, the majority of them occur in the back of our minds.

Learn how we can direct and control our attention and focus in Concetta's article "How Focus Works Psychologically."

 

Focus & Creativity

So what happens in our brain when we are not intentionally engaging in anything or when our focus is not grabbed by something unintentional, like a car approaching or a phone ringing?

There is a mode called "mind wandering," or, since it is the way the brain acts by default, the "default mode."

Mind wandering is the opposite of "stay-on-task" mode, also called "central executive," and the two are in a very delicate balance — when one is on, the other is off.

Generally speaking, stay-on-task mode is related to external and internal things or events, but when our mind wanders, we turn inward and move the focus internally. We lose contact with our perception; it's just us and our thoughts.

This can can be annoying, like when you unintentionally get swept away by unrelated thoughts while reading a book, but the mind-wandering state is also a powerful resource.

In fact, it's known as the home of creativity. If directed correctly, it can significantly help the creative process. (Yes, you can help direct it to be more productive.)

While mind wandering can be disruptive to whatever task you're immediately focusing on, it also helps with problem-solving." As Psychologist Daniel Goleman says in his book Focus: The Hidden Driver of Excellence,

"While our minds wander, we become better at anything that depends on a flash of insight, from coming up with imaginative wordplay to inventions and original thinking."

This is possible because, without the constraints or filters we have when we pay attention intentionally, our brain is free to reassemble and connect things.

The problem is that mind wandering seems to happen unpredictably, and we don't do it on command. But the good news is that this "default" mode is not totally random.

Instead, it seems to pick the unfinished businesses that populate our unconscious mind. So, if we feed our mind open questions or problems we are interested in or curious about, it will work on them, looking for that solution, assembling all the pieces, and collecting all the clues that, consciously, we'd never combine.

Learn more about how to induce this important state of creativity in "The Role of Focus in Creativity."

 

Consuming vs. Creating

Often, consumption of other peoples' media and creativity can help induce a state of mind-wandering. For example, watching a movie on Netflix can sometimes allow us to zone out and start thinking about other things. It's a valuable way to rest your mind and disengage from actively created thoughts.

However, and this is a big caveat, in today's world it is much too easy to get trapped in the infinite consumption loop of binge-watching, endless scrolling, or hours evaporating in digital rabbit holes.

In fact, we need to remember that content today, especially digital content, is created with the purpose of keeping us trapped, leveraging the dopamine reward system to keep us hooked and looking for a new shoot of dopamine. Our time on apps, websites, and social media is how those platforms make money.

This is why we often find ourselves scrolling or streaming shows even when we want to be creative — we want to write or draw or paint or create something from nothing.

Our brains know better. We don't want to just consume other people's thoughts, other people's art.

What we really want is the ability to choose and switch where our focus lies, at will. We want to stay focused but also let our minds rest. How can we do practically to be the most creative and productive people in a sustainable and healthy way?

We have plenty of processes that can backfire by default, but if managed correctly, they can become a superpower.

Learn how to exit the Consumption Loop and make Creating your superpower in: "The Battle of Consuming vs. Creating."

--

Every time I write about attention, I'm in awe of how everything works together perfectly and how this brain of ours is able to create wonders out of nothing.

Responsible use of the whole brain's circuitry can lead us to a creative, happy, and fulfilled life.

December 30, 2025 3 min read

It’s Freewrite’s favorite time of year. When dictionaries around the world examine language use of the previous year and select a “Word of the Year.”

Of course, there are many different dictionaries in use in the English language, and they all have different ideas about what word was the most influential or saw the most growth in the previous year. They individually review new slang and culturally relevant vocabulary, examine spikes or dips in usage, and pour over internet trend data.

Let’s see what some of the biggest dictionaries decided for 2025. And read to the end for a chance to submit your own Word of the Year — and win a Freewrite gift card.

[SUBMIT YOUR WORD OF THE YEAR]


Merriam-Webster: "slop"

Merriam-Webster chose "slop" as its Word of the Year for 2025 to describe "all that stuff dumped on our screens, captured in just four letters."

The dictionary lists "absurd videos, off-kilter advertising images, cheesy propaganda, fake news that looks pretty real, junky AI-written books, 'workslop' reports that waste coworkers’ time … and lots of talking cats" as examples of slop.

The original sense of the word "slop" from the 1700s was “soft mud” and eventually evolved to mean "food waste" and "rubbish." 2025 linked the term to AI, and the rest is history.

Honorable mentions: conclave, gerrymander, touch grass, performative, tariff, 67.

Dictionary.com: "67"

The team at Dictionary.com likes to pick a word that serves as “a linguistic time capsule, reflecting social trends and global events that defined the year.”

For 2025, they decided that “word” was actually a number. Or two numbers, to be exact.

If you’re an old, like me, and don’t know many school-age children, you may not have heard “67” in use. (Note that this is not “sixty-seven,” but “six, seven.”)

Dictionary.com claims the origin of “67” is a song called “Doot Doot (6 7)” by Skrilla, quickly made infamous by viral TikTok videos, most notably featuring a child who will for the rest of his life be known as the “6-7 Kid.” But according to my nine-year-old cousin, the origins of something so mystical can’t ever truly be known.

(My third grade expert also demonstrated the accompanying signature hand gesture, where you place both hands palms up and alternately move up and down.)

And if you happen to find yourself in a fourth-grade classroom, watch your mouth, because there’s a good chance this term has been banned for the teacher’s sanity.

Annoyed yet? Don’t be. As Dictionary.com points out, 6-7 is a rather delightful example at how fast language can develop as a new generation joins the conversation.

Dictionary.com honorable mentions: agentic, aura farming, broligarchy, clanker, Gen Z stare, kiss cam, overtourism, tariff, tradwife.

Oxford Dictionary: "rage bait"

With input from more than 30,000 users and expert analysis, Oxford Dictionary chose "rage bait" for their word of the year.

Specifically, the dictionary pointed to 2025’s news cycle, online manipulation tactics, and growing awareness of where we spend our time and attention online.

While closely paralleling its etymological cousin "clickbait," rage bait more specifically denotes content that evokes anger, discord, or polarization.

Oxford's experts report that use of the term has tripled in the last 12 months.

Oxford Dictionary's honorable mentions:aura farming, biohack.

Cambridge Dictionary: "parasocial"

The Cambridge Dictionary examined a sustained trend of increased searches to choose "parasocial" as its Word of the Year.

Believe it or not, this term was coined by sociologists in 1956, combining “social” with the Greek-derived prefix para-, which in this case means “similar to or parallel to, but separate from.”

But interest in and use of the term exploded this year, finally moving from a mainly academic context to the mainstream.

Cambridge Dictionary's honorable mentions: slop, delulu, skibidi, tradwife

Freewrite: TBD

This year, the Freewrite Fam is picking our own Word of the Year.

Click below to submit what you think the Word of 2025 should be, and we'll pick one submission to receive a Freewrite gift card.

[SUBMIT HERE] 

--

Sources

December 18, 2025 7 min read

What can Jane Austen's personal letters teach writers of today?

December 10, 2025 6 min read

Singer-songwriter Abner James finds his creativity in the quiet freedom of analog tools. Learn how his creative process transcends different media.

Abner James went to school for film directing. But the success of the band he and his brother formed together, Eighty Ninety, knocked him onto a different trajectory.

The band has accrued more than 40 million streams since the release of their debut EP “Elizabeth," and their work was even co-signed by Taylor Swift when the singer added Eighty Ninety to her playlist "Songs Taylor Loves.”

Now, Abner is returning to long-form writing in addition to songwriting, and with a change in media comes an examination of the creative process. We sat down to chat about what's the same — and what's different. 

ANNIE COSBY: Tell us about your songwriting process.

ABNER JAMES: The way I tend to write my songs is hunched over a guitar and just seeing what comes. Sounds become words become shapes. It's a very physical process that is really about turning my brain off.

And one of the things that occurred to me when I was traveling, actually, was that I would love to be able to do that but from a writing perspective. What would happen if I sat down and approached writing in the same way that I approached music? In a more intuitive and free-form kind of way? What would that dig up?

AC: That's basically the ethos of Freewrite.

AJ: Yes. We had just put out a record, and I was thinking about how to get into writing for the next one. It occurred to me that regardless of how I started, I always finished on a screen. And I wondered: what's the acoustic guitar version of writing?

Where there's not blue light hitting me in the face. Even if I'm using my Notes app, it's the same thing. It really gets me into a different mindset.

 "I wondered: what's the acoustic guitar version of writing?"

I grew up playing piano. That was my first instrument. And I found an old typewriter at a thrift store, and I love it. It actually reminded me a lot of playing piano, the kind of physical, the feeling of it. And it was really fun, but pretty impractical, especially because I travel a fair amount.

And so I wondered, is there such a thing as a digital typewriter? And I googled it, and I found Freewrite.

AC: What about Freewrite helps you write?

AJ:I think, pragmatically, just the E Ink screen is a huge deal, because it doesn't exhaust me in the same way. And the idea of having a tool specifically set aside for the process is appealing in an aesthetic way but also a mental-emotional way. When it comes out, it's kind of like ... It's like having an office you work out of. It's just for that.

"The way I tend to write my songs is hunched over a guitar and just seeing what comes. Sounds become words become shapes. It's a very physical process that is really about turning my brain off."

And all of the pragmatic limitations — like you're not getting texts on it, and you're not doing all that stuff on the internet — that's really helpful, too. But just having the mindset....

When I pick up a guitar, or I sit down at the piano, it very much puts me into that space. Having a tool just for words does the same thing. I find that to be really cool and inspiring.

"When I pick up a guitar, or I sit down at the piano, it very much puts me into that space. Having a tool just for words does the same thing."

AC: So mentally it gets you ready for writing.

AJ: Yeah, and also, when you write a Microsoft Word, it looks so finished that it's hard to keep going. If every time I strummed a chord, I was hearing it back, mixed and mastered and produced...?

It's hard to stay in that space when I'm seeing it fully written out and formatted in, like, Times New Roman, looking all seriously back at me.

AC: I get that. I have terrible instincts to edit stuff over and over again and never finish a story.

AJ:  Also, the way you just open it and it's ready to go. So you don't have the stages of the computer turning on, that kind of puts this pressure, this tension on.

It's working at the edges in all these different ways that on their own could feel a little bit like it's not really necessary. All these amorphous things where you could look at it and be like, well, I don't really need any of those. But they add up to a critical mass that actually is significant.

And sometimes, if I want to bring it on a plane, I've found it's replaced reading for me. Rather than pick up a book or bring a book on the plane, I bring Traveler and just kind of hang out in that space and see if anything comes up.

I've found that it's kind of like writing songs on a different instrument, you get different styles of music that you wouldn't have otherwise. I've found that writing from words towards music, I get different kinds of songs than I have in the past, which has been interesting.

In that way, like sitting at a piano, you just write differently than you do on a guitar, or even a bass, because of the things those instruments tend to encourage or that they can do.

It feels almost like a little synthesizer, a different kind of instrument that has unlocked a different kind of approach for me.

"I've found that it's kind of like writing songs on a different instrument, you get different styles of music that you wouldn't have otherwise... [Traveler] feels almost like a little synthesizer, a different kind of instrument that has unlocked a different kind of approach for me."

AC: As someone who doesn't know the first thing about writing music, that's fascinating. It's all magic to me.

AJ: Yeah.

AC: What else are you interested in writing?

AJ: I went to school for film directing. That was kind of what I thought I was going to do. And then my brother and I started the band and that kind of happened first and knocked me onto a different track for a little while after college.

Growing up, though, writing was my way into everything. In directing, I wanted to be in control of the thing that I wrote. And in music, it was the same — the songwriting really feels like it came from that same place. And then the idea of writing longer form, like fiction, almost feels just like the next step from song to EP to album to novel.

For whatever reason, that started feeling like a challenge that would be deeply related to the kinds of work that we do in the studio.

AC: Do you have any advice for aspiring songwriters?

AJ: This sounds like a cliche, but it's totally true: whatever success that I've had as a songwriter — judge that for yourself — but whatever success I have had, has been directly proportional to just writing the song that I wanted to hear.

What I mean by that is, even if you're being coldly, cynically, late-stage capitalist about it, it's by far the most success I've had. The good news is that you don't have to choose. And in fact, when you start making those little compromises, or even begin to inch in that direction, it just doesn't work. So you can forget about it.

Just make music you want to hear. And that will be the music that resonates with most people.

I think there's a temptation to have an imaginary focus group in your head of like 500 people. But the problem is all those people are fake. They're not real. None of those people are actually real people. You're a focus group of one, you're one real person. There are more real people in that focus group than in the imaginary one.

And I just don't think that we're that different, in the end. So that would be my advice.

AC: That seems like generally great creative advice. Because fiction writers talk about that too, right? Do you write to market or do you write the book you want to read. Same thing. And that imaginary focus group has been debilitating for me. I have to silence that focus group before I can write.

AJ: Absolutely.

"I think there's a temptation to have an imaginary focus group in your head of like 500 people. But the problem is all those people are fake... You're a focus group of one, you're one real person. There are more real people in that focus group than in the imaginary one."

--

Learn more about Abner James, his brother, and their band, Eighty Ninety, on Instagram.