overlaylink

Don't Be a Lonely Cloud

Michael Archambault
July 25, 2024 | 4 min read

The romantic mythology of the hermit is deep within every creative individual. As a writer, the notion is particularly enticing — disappear from view, only to emerge months later with the next once-in-a-generation novel.

But, contrary to popular belief, the legend of the brilliant hermit is likely just that — a legend, an ideal, an archetype, a dream.

Many prolific writers thought to embody the romantic recluse, like William Wordsworth, Henry David Thoreau, and Emily Dickinson, actually defy the stereotype.

A closer study reveals that we, as writers, must live fully present in the world.

These Are Not The Hermits You're Looking For

Take popular poet William Wordsworth. His poetry is full of beautiful odes to the natural world and the thoughts that come to us in solitude. From his poem, "I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud":

I wandered lonely as a cloud
That floats on high o'er vales and hills,
When all at once I saw a crowd,
A host, of golden daffodils;
Beside the lake, beneath the trees,
Fluttering and dancing in the breeze.
...
For oft, when on my couch I lie
In vacant or in pensive mood,
They flash upon that inward eye
Which is the bliss of solitude;
And then my heart with pleasure fills,
And dances with the daffodils.

Despite the public’s perception of Wordsworth as a “hermit,” he actually had an active social life and maintained healthy relationships with other writers.

Additionally, he remained active in political and social issues at the time and frequently traveled — aspects of life that greatly impacted his work.

Another famous poet allegedly known for her hermit lifestyle was Emily Dickinson. But Dickinson, too, was active throughout her younger years, maintaining social engagements and continually upholding connections through letter writing.

In fact, it wasn't until Dickinson's later years that she became more reclusive due to mental health issues.

Even Henry David Thoreau only lived in his remote cabin on Walden Pond for two years! In Walden, he wrote:

“I am naturally no hermit, but might possibly sit out the sturdiest frequenter of the bar-room, if my business called me thither.”

To Write, You Must First Live

Not being a writer tucked away from the world isn't enough, though. Classic writers throughout history have attested to the need to get up and live, to experience the world, before sitting down to write about it.

Lost Generation novelist Ernest Hemingway once stated,

"In order to write about life, first you must live it."

Even Thoreau, one of the most famous examples of the writer-hermit archetype, proclaimed,

"How vain it is to sit down to write when you have not stood up to live."

And Mark Twain told us to:

"Write what you know."

Twain's travels and experiences profoundly impacted him and his writing; if he were a hermit, he likely never would have gained the knowledge needed to shape stories around the complex society surrounding him — life during the American Civil War and a rapid time of industrialization and urbanization in America.

Many of the greatest writers of the past few centuries, even those commonly thought of as glorious hermits, rejected the notion that solitude would suddenly lead to great work. At least not without first living.

The Romanticism of Solitude

If the greatest hermit-writers of classic literature were no such thing, why does the romanticism of the idea persist to this day?

The idea likely began during the Romantic era, the late 18th to mid-19th centuries, when certain writers revered individualism. While Wordsworth and Thoreau were indeed among this group, their emphasis on solitude is misunderstood.

Contrary to popular belief, the great poets did not advocate for writers to forsake their friends and family, their other hobbies, their jobs, their entire lives, in pursuit of solitude. Instead, Wordsworth and Thoreau sought to underscore the value of personal time and, indeed, the natural world, as a way to foster a deeper understanding of the world at large and invite inspiration.

Modern-day media has yet to help dispel the myth. Popular films such as Capote show the titular author's isolated lifestyle. Similarly, the novel Big Sur depicts novelist and poet Jack Kerouac relocating to a secluded cabin to work through his process. But, in truth, neither author completely removed themselves from society.

The notion of the lone genius is a legend, and trying to recreate that sort of lifestyle can actually hinder creativity — not to mention mental health.

 

Building Modern Solitude 

While nobody recommends fully withdrawing from society for the sake of writing your book, it’s definitely true that modern writers contend with distraction on a level unknown to Wordsworth and his contemporaries.

Modern technology is better than ever at stealing our attention and keeping it. This means that, in healthy doses, seclusion can benefit the modern writer. Simply removing distractions can help writers concentrate better on their work and allow more significant space to explore ideas.

The good news? You don’t need to move to a cabin in the forest. You just need a Freewrite.

As writers, it's common to feel guilty when we are not writing. It's a little like always having homework. But it's important to remember that even the greats made sure to live.

So don't cancel on your friends. Don't spend every waking moment with your eyes glued to the blank page. Don't sell everything and move to Paris to channel the souls of the Lost Generation.

Live your life.

Live your life, and write about it.

 

RETURN TO "HOW TO BE CONSISTENTLY CREATIVE"

January 09, 2026 2 min read

A new year means a whole new crop of work is entering the public domain. And that means endless opportunities for retellings, spoofs, adaptations, and fan fiction.

December 30, 2025 3 min read

It’s Freewrite’s favorite time of year. When dictionaries around the world examine language use of the previous year and select a “Word of the Year.”

Of course, there are many different dictionaries in use in the English language, and they all have different ideas about what word was the most influential or saw the most growth in the previous year. They individually review new slang and culturally relevant vocabulary, examine spikes or dips in usage, and pour over internet trend data.

Let’s see what some of the biggest dictionaries decided for 2025. And read to the end for a chance to submit your own Word of the Year — and win a Freewrite gift card.

[SUBMIT YOUR WORD OF THE YEAR]


Merriam-Webster: "slop"

Merriam-Webster chose "slop" as its Word of the Year for 2025 to describe "all that stuff dumped on our screens, captured in just four letters."

The dictionary lists "absurd videos, off-kilter advertising images, cheesy propaganda, fake news that looks pretty real, junky AI-written books, 'workslop' reports that waste coworkers’ time … and lots of talking cats" as examples of slop.

The original sense of the word "slop" from the 1700s was “soft mud” and eventually evolved to mean "food waste" and "rubbish." 2025 linked the term to AI, and the rest is history.

Honorable mentions: conclave, gerrymander, touch grass, performative, tariff, 67.

Dictionary.com: "67"

The team at Dictionary.com likes to pick a word that serves as “a linguistic time capsule, reflecting social trends and global events that defined the year.”

For 2025, they decided that “word” was actually a number. Or two numbers, to be exact.

If you’re an old, like me, and don’t know many school-age children, you may not have heard “67” in use. (Note that this is not “sixty-seven,” but “six, seven.”)

Dictionary.com claims the origin of “67” is a song called “Doot Doot (6 7)” by Skrilla, quickly made infamous by viral TikTok videos, most notably featuring a child who will for the rest of his life be known as the “6-7 Kid.” But according to my nine-year-old cousin, the origins of something so mystical can’t ever truly be known.

(My third grade expert also demonstrated the accompanying signature hand gesture, where you place both hands palms up and alternately move up and down.)

And if you happen to find yourself in a fourth-grade classroom, watch your mouth, because there’s a good chance this term has been banned for the teacher’s sanity.

Annoyed yet? Don’t be. As Dictionary.com points out, 6-7 is a rather delightful example at how fast language can develop as a new generation joins the conversation.

Dictionary.com honorable mentions: agentic, aura farming, broligarchy, clanker, Gen Z stare, kiss cam, overtourism, tariff, tradwife.

Oxford Dictionary: "rage bait"

With input from more than 30,000 users and expert analysis, Oxford Dictionary chose "rage bait" for their word of the year.

Specifically, the dictionary pointed to 2025’s news cycle, online manipulation tactics, and growing awareness of where we spend our time and attention online.

While closely paralleling its etymological cousin "clickbait," rage bait more specifically denotes content that evokes anger, discord, or polarization.

Oxford's experts report that use of the term has tripled in the last 12 months.

Oxford Dictionary's honorable mentions:aura farming, biohack.

Cambridge Dictionary: "parasocial"

The Cambridge Dictionary examined a sustained trend of increased searches to choose "parasocial" as its Word of the Year.

Believe it or not, this term was coined by sociologists in 1956, combining “social” with the Greek-derived prefix para-, which in this case means “similar to or parallel to, but separate from.”

But interest in and use of the term exploded this year, finally moving from a mainly academic context to the mainstream.

Cambridge Dictionary's honorable mentions: slop, delulu, skibidi, tradwife

Freewrite: TBD

This year, the Freewrite Fam is picking our own Word of the Year.

Click below to submit what you think the Word of 2025 should be, and we'll pick one submission to receive a Freewrite gift card.

[SUBMIT HERE] 

--

Sources

December 18, 2025 7 min read

What can Jane Austen's personal letters teach writers of today?