overlaylink

Is Writer's Block Real?

Sophie Campbell
January 20, 2025 | 3 min read

Just as writers talk about the muse suddenly striking them with inspiration, "writer’s block" can also strike them down in an instant and last anywhere from hours to months, or even years.

But is writer’s block real? Or is it just a writer-specific term for procrastination, lack of focus, or freezing under pressure? Or is it akin to Schrödinger's cat, where the answer to both questions is "yes" and "no"?

Arguments for Writer's Block

“I tell my students there is such a thing as ‘writer’s block,’ and they should respect it. You shouldn’t write through it. It’s blocked because it ought to be blocked.” These are the words of Toni Morrison, author of Beloved.

In an interview with Lit Hub, Morrison also said, that when reading a book, she could always tell when the author had written through a block. She was alluding to the need to address, not charge past, the root cause of the issue. Maybe writer’s block is something to be respected. After all, it’s hard to argue with a Pulitzer and Nobel Prize-winning author.

Morrison also said, that when reading a book, she could always tell when the author had written through a block. She was alluding to the need to address, not charge past, the root cause of the issue.

Carmen Maria Machado, author of Her Body and Other Parties, believes writer’s block is real too. In an interview with Volume 1 Brooklyn, she said, “Reading is the way you can prevent writer’s block or get over writer’s block. You can’t keep writing if you’re not filling your gas tank with whatever you want to read.” Perhaps writer’s block is merely the result of a lack of stimulation and creative ideas. For some, it could be the root cause that Morrison hinted at.

And consider Franz Kafka, the literary equivalent of the surrealist Salvador Dali, who suffered deeply from writer’s block.

“The end of writing. When will it take me up again? ... Again tried to write, virtually useless ... Complete standstill. Unending torments.” The author of The Metamorphosis wrote many diary entries like this.

When a writer revered as a visionary struggled to put pen to paper, surely this is proof enough that writer’s block is real? But the jury is still out.

Arguments Against Writer’s Block

Another Pulitzer Prize-winning novelist to weigh in is Elizabeth Strout. In an interview with The Washington Post, Strout said, “I have never had writer’s block. My writer’s block takes the form of writing badly, which is much more preferable.”

For many, writer’s block can be attributed to a fear of failure, a lack of momentum, or perfectionism. (Take it from Margaret Atwood: “If I waited for perfection, I would never write a word.”) Some writers feel blocked when writing a messy first draft. But Strout suggests you should continue writing badly until the right words come.

For many, writer’s block can be attributed to a fear of failure, a lack of momentum, or perfectionism.

Patrick Rothfuss, author of the Kingkiller Chronicle universe, takes a strong stance on the argument. “It does not exist. We’ll state it flatly,” he said in an interview with Syfy. “No plumber ever gets to call in to work, and they’re like ‘Jake, I have plumber’s block.’”

Even career writers claim that writer’s block doesn’t exist when you’re relying on your words to pay the bills. (Amy Alkon said, “I earn a living as a syndicated columnist and author, there’s no room for writer’s block.”)

If you’re a creative writer without a deadline from an editor looming overhead, the onus is on you alone. No one else is going to make you write. Self-motivation waxes and wanes — and that’s where so-called writer’s block has the opportunity to creep in.

Writer’s Block vs. the People: Closing Argument

At Freewrite, our stance is that no, writer’s block is not a paralyzing, incurable affliction. But yes, there are forces working against you. From distracting, attention-sucking technology, to competing priorities, to your own brain.

No, writer’s block is not a paralyzing, incurable affliction. But yes, there are forces working against you.

No matter how you dress it up, writing is tough. But the good news is there are tried-and-tested ways to prevent and banish "writer’s block."

Return to “Cracking the Code of Writer’s Block."

January 28, 2026 1 min read

Write every day with the Freewrite team in February.

January 09, 2026 2 min read

A new year means a whole new crop of work is entering the public domain. And that means endless opportunities for retellings, spoofs, adaptations, and fan fiction.

December 30, 2025 3 min read

It’s Freewrite’s favorite time of year. When dictionaries around the world examine language use of the previous year and select a “Word of the Year.”

Of course, there are many different dictionaries in use in the English language, and they all have different ideas about what word was the most influential or saw the most growth in the previous year. They individually review new slang and culturally relevant vocabulary, examine spikes or dips in usage, and pour over internet trend data.

Let’s see what some of the biggest dictionaries decided for 2025. And read to the end for a chance to submit your own Word of the Year — and win a Freewrite gift card.

[SUBMIT YOUR WORD OF THE YEAR]


Merriam-Webster: "slop"

Merriam-Webster chose "slop" as its Word of the Year for 2025 to describe "all that stuff dumped on our screens, captured in just four letters."

The dictionary lists "absurd videos, off-kilter advertising images, cheesy propaganda, fake news that looks pretty real, junky AI-written books, 'workslop' reports that waste coworkers’ time … and lots of talking cats" as examples of slop.

The original sense of the word "slop" from the 1700s was “soft mud” and eventually evolved to mean "food waste" and "rubbish." 2025 linked the term to AI, and the rest is history.

Honorable mentions: conclave, gerrymander, touch grass, performative, tariff, 67.

Dictionary.com: "67"

The team at Dictionary.com likes to pick a word that serves as “a linguistic time capsule, reflecting social trends and global events that defined the year.”

For 2025, they decided that “word” was actually a number. Or two numbers, to be exact.

If you’re an old, like me, and don’t know many school-age children, you may not have heard “67” in use. (Note that this is not “sixty-seven,” but “six, seven.”)

Dictionary.com claims the origin of “67” is a song called “Doot Doot (6 7)” by Skrilla, quickly made infamous by viral TikTok videos, most notably featuring a child who will for the rest of his life be known as the “6-7 Kid.” But according to my nine-year-old cousin, the origins of something so mystical can’t ever truly be known.

(My third grade expert also demonstrated the accompanying signature hand gesture, where you place both hands palms up and alternately move up and down.)

And if you happen to find yourself in a fourth-grade classroom, watch your mouth, because there’s a good chance this term has been banned for the teacher’s sanity.

Annoyed yet? Don’t be. As Dictionary.com points out, 6-7 is a rather delightful example at how fast language can develop as a new generation joins the conversation.

Dictionary.com honorable mentions: agentic, aura farming, broligarchy, clanker, Gen Z stare, kiss cam, overtourism, tariff, tradwife.

Oxford Dictionary: "rage bait"

With input from more than 30,000 users and expert analysis, Oxford Dictionary chose "rage bait" for their word of the year.

Specifically, the dictionary pointed to 2025’s news cycle, online manipulation tactics, and growing awareness of where we spend our time and attention online.

While closely paralleling its etymological cousin "clickbait," rage bait more specifically denotes content that evokes anger, discord, or polarization.

Oxford's experts report that use of the term has tripled in the last 12 months.

Oxford Dictionary's honorable mentions:aura farming, biohack.

Cambridge Dictionary: "parasocial"

The Cambridge Dictionary examined a sustained trend of increased searches to choose "parasocial" as its Word of the Year.

Believe it or not, this term was coined by sociologists in 1956, combining “social” with the Greek-derived prefix para-, which in this case means “similar to or parallel to, but separate from.”

But interest in and use of the term exploded this year, finally moving from a mainly academic context to the mainstream.

Cambridge Dictionary's honorable mentions: slop, delulu, skibidi, tradwife

Freewrite: TBD

This year, the Freewrite Fam is picking our own Word of the Year.

Click below to submit what you think the Word of 2025 should be, and we'll pick one submission to receive a Freewrite gift card.

[SUBMIT HERE] 

--

Sources