overlaylink

Research & Writing with Freewrite: Journalist Celeste Headlee's Process

Annie Cosby
June 18, 2024 | 5 min read

Extensive research, hours of reading, slogging through historical records...

As an award-winning journalist, podcast host, speaker, and author, Celeste Headlee is no stranger to research.

Her latest book, Do Nothing, is a deep dive into humanity's relationship with work over the course of our existence and how we can fix the modern issue of burnout. And it was written entirely on Freewrite.

Of course, tracing the trajectory of human labor and existence required extensive research. 

So how does Freewrite fit into Celeste's process?

Join us for an exploration of how journalists approach research and what a research-heavy workflow on Freewrite looks like.

ANNIE COSBY: Can you give us a short history of your journey to becoming a writer?

CELESTE HEADLEE: It depends on what you mean by writer. I've been a journalist for over 25 years. But I got my first book contract in 2016, and that's when I think I became a writer the way most people mean it.

I'm now working on my fourth full-length book, and I've had two shorter books, as well. I’m also a public speaker, so I'm writing speeches all the time.

Essentially, most of what I do, including journalism, involves writing of some kind.

AC: Do Nothing was not your first book, but it is the first book you wrote on Freewrite.

CH: Yes, Do Nothing was the first book I wrote beginning to end on my Freewrite.

And it required a lot of research. I had to read a lot of extraordinarily boring books and labor records about the way people spent their days in ancient Greece and all these other things so that nobody else has to do that.

AC: [laughs] That’s very appreciated.

CH: Yes, I’m going to suffer for you.

But many of the challenges I ran into are the same as with any research that predates the Industrial Revolution. If you're looking at some narrative written by a landowner in the medieval age talking about the behavior of his serfs, that's not particularly accurate.

You need to find the actual records of these things, which often no library in the world has — except maybe the Library of Congress — and maybe even not the Library of Congress, because a lot of these texts predate America.

The other thing is that you have to ask the right questions. That's always the challenge in research.

And you need to be as unbiased as possible. You have to make sure you are not skewing your research, that you're not just looking for the answer you want.

So I had to ask questions not like “Did people work harder before the factories?” But more objective: “How many hours per day did the average manual worker work?” And so much of it is dependent on income level or class, so I had to ask these questions for every single different group of people.

Celeste's view on the go

Photo by Celeste Headlee

AC: At Freewrite, we often get pushback from people doing research-heavy work who say distraction-free devices wouldn’t work for them because of the need to look things up. We obviously disagree, and think research should not happen at the same time as drafting. You do this regularly — what does your process look like?

CH: I do research first, and then I create an outline and sort all my tidbits, all my citations, all the statistics into the outline.

By the time I'm sitting down to write at my Freewrite, I have everything in basic order and printed on actual paper. I put them up on little stands in front of me, and when I finish using a citation or a resource, I put a pen mark through it.

Obviously, you're going to go back later and shift stuff around during the editing process or add citations, and I hire a fact-checker. Frankly, that kind of work doesn't require deep focus. But the writing part of it needs my full executive function.

So I just sit there at the Freewrite, not able to do a “real quick” check on the internet for anything. Not being able to go back, and cut and paste, and all of that stuff, it freed me. And I felt better.

In days past, as a journalist, you sit at the computer and you're pulling tape and blah, blah, blah, pulling clips from interviews... You get done and you're exhausted. You just feel done.

That’s because, A — computer screens are very, very exhausting to your brain and your eyeballs.

And B — it's because I had a billion tabs open. Why do we think we need to keep them open? Do we really think we're saving time? It's ludicrous.

But the way I feel after spending several hours writing without distractions on Freewrite is worlds away from the way I feel when I get up from my computer at the end of the day.

AC: So even if your writing is based on research, the distraction-free environment helps.

CH: And not only that — you do better writing because you're able to do the writing in a way that is straightforward: beginning, middle, and end.

You're sitting down, and you have an outline in front of you, and you're writing the story. You're saying, “Once upon a time, there was a woman who was getting sick all the time and couldn't figure out what was going wrong…”

It gives you a kind of continuity that you don't get when you're constantly flipping to a different tab, looking stuff up, using a thesaurus.

You know, Stephen King says, any word that you found in the thesaurus is the wrong word.

Continuity quote

I'm completely paraphrasing his wonderful book on writing, but he's basically saying, stop checking the thesaurus. Use your own voice.

Using Freewrite forces you to do that. Essentially what you're doing is Joan Didion’s shitty first draft.

And you think you're making a shitty first draft, but the beauty of it is that it's not as shitty as you thought it was. It's your own voice. You're explaining what's happening and telling the story in your words — and that requires real focus.

Shitty first draft quote

AC: And when you get to editing, you’re sometimes surprised to find, wait, that came out of my brain? Like you said, it doesn’t exhaust you the way striving for perfection and editing-as-you-go is exhausting.

CH: Especially if you're a professional writer, or you do any kind of writing on a regular basis, even though it's creative work, it's still work. And so you can dread it, right?

With Freewrite, I don’t get that dread. I don't dread sitting down in front of it, because it's not going to make me feel horrible.

Working on an instrument that doesn't deplete you… I can walk away from my Freewrite and feel fine. I can go do other stuff that day, which is totally not possible if I sit there in front of the computer for five hours.

It’s making writing an enjoyable experience rather than just this burden.

 

Do Nothing by Celeste Headlee

Read our interview with Celeste all about the life-changing philosophy she outlines in her latest book, Do Nothing. 

 

January 28, 2026 1 min read

Write every day with the Freewrite team in February.

January 09, 2026 2 min read

A new year means a whole new crop of work is entering the public domain. And that means endless opportunities for retellings, spoofs, adaptations, and fan fiction.

December 30, 2025 3 min read

It’s Freewrite’s favorite time of year. When dictionaries around the world examine language use of the previous year and select a “Word of the Year.”

Of course, there are many different dictionaries in use in the English language, and they all have different ideas about what word was the most influential or saw the most growth in the previous year. They individually review new slang and culturally relevant vocabulary, examine spikes or dips in usage, and pour over internet trend data.

Let’s see what some of the biggest dictionaries decided for 2025. And read to the end for a chance to submit your own Word of the Year — and win a Freewrite gift card.

[SUBMIT YOUR WORD OF THE YEAR]


Merriam-Webster: "slop"

Merriam-Webster chose "slop" as its Word of the Year for 2025 to describe "all that stuff dumped on our screens, captured in just four letters."

The dictionary lists "absurd videos, off-kilter advertising images, cheesy propaganda, fake news that looks pretty real, junky AI-written books, 'workslop' reports that waste coworkers’ time … and lots of talking cats" as examples of slop.

The original sense of the word "slop" from the 1700s was “soft mud” and eventually evolved to mean "food waste" and "rubbish." 2025 linked the term to AI, and the rest is history.

Honorable mentions: conclave, gerrymander, touch grass, performative, tariff, 67.

Dictionary.com: "67"

The team at Dictionary.com likes to pick a word that serves as “a linguistic time capsule, reflecting social trends and global events that defined the year.”

For 2025, they decided that “word” was actually a number. Or two numbers, to be exact.

If you’re an old, like me, and don’t know many school-age children, you may not have heard “67” in use. (Note that this is not “sixty-seven,” but “six, seven.”)

Dictionary.com claims the origin of “67” is a song called “Doot Doot (6 7)” by Skrilla, quickly made infamous by viral TikTok videos, most notably featuring a child who will for the rest of his life be known as the “6-7 Kid.” But according to my nine-year-old cousin, the origins of something so mystical can’t ever truly be known.

(My third grade expert also demonstrated the accompanying signature hand gesture, where you place both hands palms up and alternately move up and down.)

And if you happen to find yourself in a fourth-grade classroom, watch your mouth, because there’s a good chance this term has been banned for the teacher’s sanity.

Annoyed yet? Don’t be. As Dictionary.com points out, 6-7 is a rather delightful example at how fast language can develop as a new generation joins the conversation.

Dictionary.com honorable mentions: agentic, aura farming, broligarchy, clanker, Gen Z stare, kiss cam, overtourism, tariff, tradwife.

Oxford Dictionary: "rage bait"

With input from more than 30,000 users and expert analysis, Oxford Dictionary chose "rage bait" for their word of the year.

Specifically, the dictionary pointed to 2025’s news cycle, online manipulation tactics, and growing awareness of where we spend our time and attention online.

While closely paralleling its etymological cousin "clickbait," rage bait more specifically denotes content that evokes anger, discord, or polarization.

Oxford's experts report that use of the term has tripled in the last 12 months.

Oxford Dictionary's honorable mentions:aura farming, biohack.

Cambridge Dictionary: "parasocial"

The Cambridge Dictionary examined a sustained trend of increased searches to choose "parasocial" as its Word of the Year.

Believe it or not, this term was coined by sociologists in 1956, combining “social” with the Greek-derived prefix para-, which in this case means “similar to or parallel to, but separate from.”

But interest in and use of the term exploded this year, finally moving from a mainly academic context to the mainstream.

Cambridge Dictionary's honorable mentions: slop, delulu, skibidi, tradwife

Freewrite: TBD

This year, the Freewrite Fam is picking our own Word of the Year.

Click below to submit what you think the Word of 2025 should be, and we'll pick one submission to receive a Freewrite gift card.

[SUBMIT HERE] 

--

Sources