overlaylink

Is Serialization the Future of Publishing?

Sophie Campbell
August 11, 2024 | 7 min read

The first time I heard of serial novels, I was in my early teens. Spending most of my free time after school writing short stories, listening to Paramore, and scrolling Tumblr in the late 2000s, I came across a news article about fellow Scottish teenager Estelle Maskame.

Estelle was sharing her novel draft one chapter at a time and getting instant feedback from a huge readership on Wattpad, a social storytelling platform where writers and readers can connect, share their stories, and read writing from others.

I followed the story, and I was amazed. Until then, I had no idea writers could have such autonomy over the distribution of their work and gain fans at a young age without the backing of a major publisher. And here I am, 10 years on, still utterly fascinated by self-publishing and serialization.

Maskame garnered such success with her Wattpad novel Did I Mention I Love You? that she attracted the attention of a major publisher and mainstream success followed. Now in her 20s, she has published 10 novels.

Serialization isn’t something new. But with relatively young and already huge platforms like Substack (founded in 2017) and Kindle Vella (founded in 2021), as well as Patreon, Wattpad, and others, a fresh resurgence is gaining momentum.

This begs the question: is serialization the future of publishing?

Historical Examples of the Serialized Novel

Serial fiction actually predates the traditional publishing model we’re most familiar with today.

Long before social storytelling and self-publishing platforms, the internet, and even telegrams, authors were serializing their work in newspapers and literary magazines.

Charles Dickens’s works were not originally published as complete books. The Posthumous Papers of the Pickwick Club and Great Expectations were first published as serials in monthly installments sold for 1 shilling each.

Similarly, penny dreadfuls – affordable, popular serials sold for a penny each – were hugely popular in 19th-century Britain. Typically filled with sensational stories in the crime, horror, and supernatural genres, penny dreadfuls date to the 1830s, with their roots reaching back to “the gothic novel and beyond, to Jacobean tragedies, macabre folklore, and ballads.”

With the introduction of radio and later television, the popularity of serials in literature took a downturn. But the publishing format never completely vanished and enjoyed a short resurgence in the 1970s-80s. Even Hunter S. Thompson’s revered Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas was first published as a serial in Rolling Stone magazine in 1971.

From the late 1990s, we’ve been riding the wave of a boom in long-form serial television with shows like The Sopranos, Breaking Bad, Sons of Anarchy, Game of Thrones, and many more. And I suspect the appetites of readers are mirroring this want for epic, episodic content.

Since its advent, serial fiction has experienced ebbs and flows in popularity. And now, I think we’re seeing an uptick in demand again. But this time, authors have much more ownership, mobility, and mechanisms to monetize their writing, too.

The Self-Publishing Boom

According to WordsRated, the number of self-published books released in the last five years has increased by 264%. The publishing world has always been hugely competitive. And with more widely available support, resources, and self-publishing platforms than ever before, it’s no surprise more and more aspiring authors are opting to release their work themselves.

With this route to publication, authors are firmly in charge of their work. But that’s not to say self-publishing is quick or easy — far from it. When you work with a traditional publisher, all you need to be is the writer. When you self-publish, you need to be the editor, cover designer, promoter, distributor … the list goes on. But especially for writers who haven’t or don’t want to secure an agent or a publisher, self-publishing is appealing because it puts the power back in their hands. And with digital-only serial publishing, there’s little to no upfront investment required from writers to get started.

Another trend that is coinciding with self-publishing is that traditionally published bestsellers have never been shorter. Given that we’ve never had more access to content and our attention spans are dwindling as a result, is that why readers are favoring shorter physical books and bite-sized reads online?

Generation Z certainly is. According to research by Wattpad, “Gen Z makes up 80% of Wattpad’s audience of 90 million people worldwide, who collectively spend 23 billion minutes per month on the site engaging with original stories.”

It’s possible, though, that serial fiction is nothing more than a passing trend that won’t last in our binge-obsessed culture. But it’s equally possible that serial fiction is providing a more accessible way to read in our small pockets of downtime. Furthermore, could serial fiction actually help train our over-saturated brains to savor each chapter and be patient for the next installment? I’d go with the latter.

Authors Serializing Their Novels Today

Patreon creator Zogarth has shared over 300 chapters of The Primal Hunter novels with over 12,000 members, earning $61,190 per month as of August 2024. And Sleyca posts chapters of Royal Road for over 8,000 members to read on the same platform, earning $36,120 per month.

While success stories of this magnitude are rare, they’re not unheard of. And writers are building fandoms and modest-to-substantial monetary success on other platforms too, like Substack.

Author, educator, and environmental activist Bill McKibben started publishing a novel called The Other Cheek serially on his Substack newsletter, The Crucial Years.

Writing for Literary Hub, Bill says, “Stretching out publication comes with its own mix of benefits and drawbacks, but I do wish more writers would give it a try. And the economics aren’t impossible — a newsletter subscription of $6 a month, which is the Substack average, combined with even just a few hundred readers probably beats the advance for most novelists.”

A Hybrid Approach to Publishing

Another author who found success on Substack is Elle Griffin (The Elysian). In 2023, Elle gave a TEDx Talk entitled, What if we release books episodically? In this talk, Elle shares her own experience of serializing novels on Substack and returning to a centuries-old publishing method with a modern twist. The talk attracted attention, racking up over 41 million views on YouTube.

Going straight to the source, I asked Elle if she believes serialization is the future of publishing.

Rather than viewing self-publishing as an outright alternative to traditional publishing, Elle believes it could be an exciting addition or even a prelude, helping to build an audience before a physical book release.

She says, “The existing industry could still flourish, but authors could have an early incentive that gets their fans involved and increases their earning potential.”

One of the areas in which self-published and serial authors struggle most is marketing. If you don’t promote your work and reach a wider audience, you can’t attract an engaged readership. This is where traditional publishers with big budgets and marketing and PR teams have the advantage. But Elle didn’t have a readymade audience prior to joining Substack, and now she has 20,000 subscribers.

“There are also plenty of authors who started out on Substack with zero subscribers a year ago and now have 500 or 1,000 subscribers who follow their fiction. You don't have to start with a large audience to be successful, and you can also have a very tiny audience and still be successful.”

How Serialization Can Skyrocket Writing Productivity

Science fiction and fantasy writer Simon K Jones, who you might recognize from The Writing Life Podcast which he produced for several years, also has experience serializing novels on Substack.

At first, this endeavor was only supposed to be a short experiment back in 2014 with a story called “A Day of Faces.” But it quickly turned into an exercise that boosted Simon’s productivity and helped him build a healthy writing habit.

“At that time, I'd never satisfactorily completed a long-form project, with many incomplete drafts hidden in drawers and on my computer. I'd always get distracted by something new and shiny,” he says. It sounds like a Freewrite might have come in handy. “As soon as I started serializing, which for me means writing and publishing a new chapter each week, it was like flicking a switch in my brain. Knowing that there are readers out there, waiting for the next chapter, brings me back to the page.”

Almost a decade on, Simon has published three major serials, published a paperback version of his novel No Adults Allowed and is now halfway through a much larger serial called Tales from the Triverse.

Simon believes the future of publishing will involve a mix of mediums rather than just one. “They all do slightly different things and have their own audiences, albeit with lots of crossover … Online spaces have definitely led to a resurgence in serialization for prose fiction over the last decade, which I'm very excited about. For writers, there are more ways to publish your work than ever before.”

Simon also expresses how enormously fun the process of serialization is. “It’s also one of the tightest and most exciting ways to interact with your readers,” he says. “If anyone reading this is struggling with completing projects, or getting the words down, then I highly recommend trying a serial. The regular cadence of writing and publishing can unlock a level of productivity in writers that they may not have thought possible. You can't improve as a writer until you start writing regularly.”

Is Serial Fiction Here to Stay?

With platforms like Substack, Wattpad, Patreon, and Kindle Vella empowering writers to share their work with more creative freedom and accessibility, I think serials will continue to enjoy this resurgence in popularity. And I don’t think big publishers should be quaking in their boots either.

Online serials should be seen as a welcome addition to the publishing world, just like ebooks, audiobooks, and fiction podcasts. This hybrid, DIY approach to publishing on social storytelling platforms will continue to grow and, I have no doubt, evolve.

When writers can quickly set up a profile, start connecting directly with readers, get instant focus-group-style feedback, and build a supportive, even paying, following primed to buy their work if and when they choose to release a full-length book, it’s easy to see why serializing novels online is such an attractive proposition.

December 30, 2025 3 min read

It’s Freewrite’s favorite time of year. When dictionaries around the world examine language use of the previous year and select a “Word of the Year.”

Of course, there are many different dictionaries in use in the English language, and they all have different ideas about what word was the most influential or saw the most growth in the previous year. They individually review new slang and culturally relevant vocabulary, examine spikes or dips in usage, and pour over internet trend data.

Let’s see what some of the biggest dictionaries decided for 2025. And read to the end for a chance to submit your own Word of the Year — and win a Freewrite gift card.

[SUBMIT YOUR WORD OF THE YEAR]


Merriam-Webster: "slop"

Merriam-Webster chose "slop" as its Word of the Year for 2025 to describe "all that stuff dumped on our screens, captured in just four letters."

The dictionary lists "absurd videos, off-kilter advertising images, cheesy propaganda, fake news that looks pretty real, junky AI-written books, 'workslop' reports that waste coworkers’ time … and lots of talking cats" as examples of slop.

The original sense of the word "slop" from the 1700s was “soft mud” and eventually evolved to mean "food waste" and "rubbish." 2025 linked the term to AI, and the rest is history.

Honorable mentions: conclave, gerrymander, touch grass, performative, tariff, 67.

Dictionary.com: "67"

The team at Dictionary.com likes to pick a word that serves as “a linguistic time capsule, reflecting social trends and global events that defined the year.”

For 2025, they decided that “word” was actually a number. Or two numbers, to be exact.

If you’re an old, like me, and don’t know many school-age children, you may not have heard “67” in use. (Note that this is not “sixty-seven,” but “six, seven.”)

Dictionary.com claims the origin of “67” is a song called “Doot Doot (6 7)” by Skrilla, quickly made infamous by viral TikTok videos, most notably featuring a child who will for the rest of his life be known as the “6-7 Kid.” But according to my nine-year-old cousin, the origins of something so mystical can’t ever truly be known.

(My third grade expert also demonstrated the accompanying signature hand gesture, where you place both hands palms up and alternately move up and down.)

And if you happen to find yourself in a fourth-grade classroom, watch your mouth, because there’s a good chance this term has been banned for the teacher’s sanity.

Annoyed yet? Don’t be. As Dictionary.com points out, 6-7 is a rather delightful example at how fast language can develop as a new generation joins the conversation.

Dictionary.com honorable mentions: agentic, aura farming, broligarchy, clanker, Gen Z stare, kiss cam, overtourism, tariff, tradwife.

Oxford Dictionary: "rage bait"

With input from more than 30,000 users and expert analysis, Oxford Dictionary chose "rage bait" for their word of the year.

Specifically, the dictionary pointed to 2025’s news cycle, online manipulation tactics, and growing awareness of where we spend our time and attention online.

While closely paralleling its etymological cousin "clickbait," rage bait more specifically denotes content that evokes anger, discord, or polarization.

Oxford's experts report that use of the term has tripled in the last 12 months.

Oxford Dictionary's honorable mentions:aura farming, biohack.

Cambridge Dictionary: "parasocial"

The Cambridge Dictionary examined a sustained trend of increased searches to choose "parasocial" as its Word of the Year.

Believe it or not, this term was coined by sociologists in 1956, combining “social” with the Greek-derived prefix para-, which in this case means “similar to or parallel to, but separate from.”

But interest in and use of the term exploded this year, finally moving from a mainly academic context to the mainstream.

Cambridge Dictionary's honorable mentions: slop, delulu, skibidi, tradwife

Freewrite: TBD

This year, the Freewrite Fam is picking our own Word of the Year.

Click below to submit what you think the Word of 2025 should be, and we'll pick one submission to receive a Freewrite gift card.

[SUBMIT HERE] 

--

Sources

December 18, 2025 7 min read

What can Jane Austen's personal letters teach writers of today?

December 10, 2025 6 min read

Singer-songwriter Abner James finds his creativity in the quiet freedom of analog tools. Learn how his creative process transcends different media.

Abner James went to school for film directing. But the success of the band he and his brother formed together, Eighty Ninety, knocked him onto a different trajectory.

The band has accrued more than 40 million streams since the release of their debut EP “Elizabeth," and their work was even co-signed by Taylor Swift when the singer added Eighty Ninety to her playlist "Songs Taylor Loves.”

Now, Abner is returning to long-form writing in addition to songwriting, and with a change in media comes an examination of the creative process. We sat down to chat about what's the same — and what's different. 

ANNIE COSBY: Tell us about your songwriting process.

ABNER JAMES: The way I tend to write my songs is hunched over a guitar and just seeing what comes. Sounds become words become shapes. It's a very physical process that is really about turning my brain off.

And one of the things that occurred to me when I was traveling, actually, was that I would love to be able to do that but from a writing perspective. What would happen if I sat down and approached writing in the same way that I approached music? In a more intuitive and free-form kind of way? What would that dig up?

AC: That's basically the ethos of Freewrite.

AJ: Yes. We had just put out a record, and I was thinking about how to get into writing for the next one. It occurred to me that regardless of how I started, I always finished on a screen. And I wondered: what's the acoustic guitar version of writing?

Where there's not blue light hitting me in the face. Even if I'm using my Notes app, it's the same thing. It really gets me into a different mindset.

 "I wondered: what's the acoustic guitar version of writing?"

I grew up playing piano. That was my first instrument. And I found an old typewriter at a thrift store, and I love it. It actually reminded me a lot of playing piano, the kind of physical, the feeling of it. And it was really fun, but pretty impractical, especially because I travel a fair amount.

And so I wondered, is there such a thing as a digital typewriter? And I googled it, and I found Freewrite.

AC: What about Freewrite helps you write?

AJ:I think, pragmatically, just the E Ink screen is a huge deal, because it doesn't exhaust me in the same way. And the idea of having a tool specifically set aside for the process is appealing in an aesthetic way but also a mental-emotional way. When it comes out, it's kind of like ... It's like having an office you work out of. It's just for that.

"The way I tend to write my songs is hunched over a guitar and just seeing what comes. Sounds become words become shapes. It's a very physical process that is really about turning my brain off."

And all of the pragmatic limitations — like you're not getting texts on it, and you're not doing all that stuff on the internet — that's really helpful, too. But just having the mindset....

When I pick up a guitar, or I sit down at the piano, it very much puts me into that space. Having a tool just for words does the same thing. I find that to be really cool and inspiring.

"When I pick up a guitar, or I sit down at the piano, it very much puts me into that space. Having a tool just for words does the same thing."

AC: So mentally it gets you ready for writing.

AJ: Yeah, and also, when you write a Microsoft Word, it looks so finished that it's hard to keep going. If every time I strummed a chord, I was hearing it back, mixed and mastered and produced...?

It's hard to stay in that space when I'm seeing it fully written out and formatted in, like, Times New Roman, looking all seriously back at me.

AC: I get that. I have terrible instincts to edit stuff over and over again and never finish a story.

AJ:  Also, the way you just open it and it's ready to go. So you don't have the stages of the computer turning on, that kind of puts this pressure, this tension on.

It's working at the edges in all these different ways that on their own could feel a little bit like it's not really necessary. All these amorphous things where you could look at it and be like, well, I don't really need any of those. But they add up to a critical mass that actually is significant.

And sometimes, if I want to bring it on a plane, I've found it's replaced reading for me. Rather than pick up a book or bring a book on the plane, I bring Traveler and just kind of hang out in that space and see if anything comes up.

I've found that it's kind of like writing songs on a different instrument, you get different styles of music that you wouldn't have otherwise. I've found that writing from words towards music, I get different kinds of songs than I have in the past, which has been interesting.

In that way, like sitting at a piano, you just write differently than you do on a guitar, or even a bass, because of the things those instruments tend to encourage or that they can do.

It feels almost like a little synthesizer, a different kind of instrument that has unlocked a different kind of approach for me.

"I've found that it's kind of like writing songs on a different instrument, you get different styles of music that you wouldn't have otherwise... [Traveler] feels almost like a little synthesizer, a different kind of instrument that has unlocked a different kind of approach for me."

AC: As someone who doesn't know the first thing about writing music, that's fascinating. It's all magic to me.

AJ: Yeah.

AC: What else are you interested in writing?

AJ: I went to school for film directing. That was kind of what I thought I was going to do. And then my brother and I started the band and that kind of happened first and knocked me onto a different track for a little while after college.

Growing up, though, writing was my way into everything. In directing, I wanted to be in control of the thing that I wrote. And in music, it was the same — the songwriting really feels like it came from that same place. And then the idea of writing longer form, like fiction, almost feels just like the next step from song to EP to album to novel.

For whatever reason, that started feeling like a challenge that would be deeply related to the kinds of work that we do in the studio.

AC: Do you have any advice for aspiring songwriters?

AJ: This sounds like a cliche, but it's totally true: whatever success that I've had as a songwriter — judge that for yourself — but whatever success I have had, has been directly proportional to just writing the song that I wanted to hear.

What I mean by that is, even if you're being coldly, cynically, late-stage capitalist about it, it's by far the most success I've had. The good news is that you don't have to choose. And in fact, when you start making those little compromises, or even begin to inch in that direction, it just doesn't work. So you can forget about it.

Just make music you want to hear. And that will be the music that resonates with most people.

I think there's a temptation to have an imaginary focus group in your head of like 500 people. But the problem is all those people are fake. They're not real. None of those people are actually real people. You're a focus group of one, you're one real person. There are more real people in that focus group than in the imaginary one.

And I just don't think that we're that different, in the end. So that would be my advice.

AC: That seems like generally great creative advice. Because fiction writers talk about that too, right? Do you write to market or do you write the book you want to read. Same thing. And that imaginary focus group has been debilitating for me. I have to silence that focus group before I can write.

AJ: Absolutely.

"I think there's a temptation to have an imaginary focus group in your head of like 500 people. But the problem is all those people are fake... You're a focus group of one, you're one real person. There are more real people in that focus group than in the imaginary one."

--

Learn more about Abner James, his brother, and their band, Eighty Ninety, on Instagram.