overlaylink

Is Your Tech Sabotaging Your Health?

Emily Pogue
August 07, 2024 | 7 min read

Today, it seems like every piece of technology needs to have at least two functions (more realistically, five) to be considered competitive.

We can check our text messages on a smart fridge. We can check our sleep score to see how well we slept without thinking about how we feel.

We can buy a toothbrush that sends updates to our phone detailing how effective our brushing has been.

It's convenient, sure. But has this access to everything β€” everything β€” all at once affected how our brains work?

The Dawn of Smart Devices

The first smart device was the IBM Simon Personal Communicator, released in August 1994. At eight inches long and weighing over a pound, Simon wasn’t exactly the epitome of sleek.

Yet, at the time, it was darn impressive, because it allowed its user access to many functions (not yet called β€œapps”), including:

  • Calculator
  • Calendar
  • Fax
  • Email
  • Alarm clock
  • Notepad
  • To-do list

Instead of having to walk to the fax machine to manually send a message (talk about a phrase that hasn’t been uttered in a decade), you could simply type into this tiny box and be on your way.

From this point, humans were hooked on multi-functionality. And very rapidly, we expanded upon IBM’s vision.

Realizing the Effects of Smart Devices on Mental Health

In the thirty years since Simon was released, we’ve moved light-years ahead in what smart devices can do. With smart glasses, smart rings, smart watches, and (of course) smartphones all now available, fairly affordable, and rapidly evolving, we have the chance to be connected every second of every day.

In response, many scientists and psychologists have set out to determine exactly how this instant access to everything under the sun affects our emotional, behavioral, and mental health.

The results are about what you’d expect. Studies have shown just how dependent we’ve become on our smartphones, with nearly half of the respondents of one study by the Pew Research Center saying they would be β€œunable to live without their phone” and that being separated from their phone results in feelings of β€œanxiety and withdrawal.” Dependence on smart devices is a very real phenomenon affecting today’s population, particularly younger generations, who have never known a world without this kind of technology.

With 95% of teens ages 13-17 having access to a smartphone, emerging research has found that a person’s hours of screen time per day directly correlates to adverse mental health effects. In one eleven-year survey by Gunnell and colleagues, researchers found that an increase in screen time was associated with an increase in anxiety and depression in children and young adults.

Studies have shown just how dependent we’ve become on our smartphones, with nearly half of the respondentsΒ of one study by the Pew Research Center saying they would be "unable to live without their phone."Β 

Additionally, one of the most-cited consequences of smart device use has been a disturbance of sleep. Many of us have heard of the idea of going β€œscreen-less” for the last hour of our waking day.

There are several reasons for this. The blue light emitted from our phones, laptops, and tablets can throw off our body’s internal clock. At the same time, doing thought-heavy activities like playing games or thinking of a witty response to fire back to a friend can continue to stimulate the mind, rather than winding it down for sleep.

But there’sΒ another process that many of us fall victim to every week: revenge bedtime procrastination.

Essentially, during our busy day, we feel like we can’t get a moment to ourselves. So, once we get into bed, we hop on our smart device and scroll, absorbing all the content we can. We’re determined to carve out a little personal time β€” even if that comes at theΒ price of fragmented sleep.

Poor sleep from this cycle can weaken our ability to make decisions, while increasing anxiety and depression.

Our Dwindling Need to Recall Knowledge

In addition to affecting stress levels and sleep quality, some researchersΒ suggest that our way of learning and absorbing information has changed after using these devices so regularly for so long.

Imagine that it’s thirty years ago, and your sink is leaking.

Well, in 1994, β€œGoogle” was not a verb; in fact, it wasn’t even a word. This meant that you couldn’t simply type β€œhow to fix leak” into a search bar and be gifted with a step-by-step guide on what to do.

Instead, you’d likely go through some trial and error to see if you could figure out how to stop that leak, which would require a significant amount of brainpower and problem-solving.

Today, we don’t have to go through this thought-stimulating process. Instead, we simply type a few letters on our screen, and we’re given exact steps to accomplish what we need.

The problem? Having this constant access to technology may affect our ability to recall information we’ve previously learned. It makes sense β€” why should our mind spend the brainpower retaining this information when we can effortlessly look it up again if we need it?

(And smart devices' effect on our ability to focus? Our utter inability toΒ multitask? ThoseΒ are wholeΒ separate topics!)

Having this constant access to technology may affect our ability to recall information we've previously learned.

This constant access to information has also led to a decline in an essential aspect of our mental health: socialization.

Let’s say it's still 1994 and you haven’t been able to fix that annoying leak in your sink. To get some assistance, you may head down to the hardware store to ask an associate for advice. Or you might call your dad.

While these interactions may seem inconsequential, we know that these socialΒ interactions are essential to our brain health. Unfortunately, people today are experiencing fewer and fewer encounters like these due to the isolating nature of smart devices.

BreakingΒ Our Dopamine Addiction

There's another sneaky process at work in fueling our addiction to smart devices. Constantly checking notifications, whether it be a text, comment on an Instagram post, or a reminder to play Wordle, has been found to give our brains a boost in dopamine.

Dopamine is a neurotransmitter that can help us feel pleasure. This is why seeing that someone left a comment on your Facebook post (or TikTok, depending on your generation) can leave you feeling a certain kind of high.

However, dopamine isn’t all rainbows and good feelings. When you obtain regular spikes in dopamine, your body begins to need more dopamine to continue to feel that pleasure. So, you need to check your notifications more and more often to continue to get that positive feeling.

And when that person isn’t checking their alerts β€” what happens?

They experience more emotional lows. These low feelings can lead to more stress and anxiety that can impact all aspects of life.

It's far past time we re-regulate how much dopamine our brains get β€” and hopefully, move into a healthier, more natural cycle.

It's far past time we re-regulate how much dopamine our brains get β€” and hopefully, move into a healthier, more natural cycle.

The Difference of a Single-Purpose Device

With all this emerging research on the effects of smart devices, the idea of moving back toward simplicity and β€œdoing one thing well” has become a major discussion in the tech world in recent years.

A single-purpose device is exactly what it sounds like: a device that has one function and one function only. For example, a fridge that merely keeps your food cold rather than reading you the weather report.

As these sole-use products continue to rise in popularity, we’ll no doubt see more studies comparing the mental health implications of using a single-feature product versus a smart device. But we can already draw some conclusions from smart device-focused research.

It’s been found that, on average, people check their email between 11 and 36 times per hour. This can mean that during the work day, a person is checking their email, Slack, orΒ another communication app every six minutes.

Six minutes!

How can you get a workflow going if you’re interrupting yourself ten times an hour? Already we can see the benefits of stripping away distractions to focus on mentally taxing tasks like reading and writing.

Of course, many people still have plenty of non-technological single-purpose items we use daily: a coffee maker that strictly brews coffee; a dresser that holds your clothes; a mechanical watch that does not keep track of your step count. Rather than that jolting nuclear-alarm-meltdown sound that is the default on the iPhone,Β many peopleΒ elect to set a physical alarm clock to wake them up.

These items do one purpose well, and that’s all we need (and expect) from them. In some ways, it’s reassuring toΒ experience that focus.Β It’s also better for your brain.

However, it’s important to point out that single-purpose devicesΒ don't necessarilyΒ need to be non-technical. There are exceptionally fancy alarm clocks available today, from ones that roll around the floor to others that mimic the rising sun. Yet, most of these are not also allowing you to check your emails first thing in the morning.

And that's a good thing.

Teams likeΒ those hereΒ at Freewrite and over at brands like Light Phone and Brick are developing great single-purpose tech to help you do more of what you love without sacrificing your mental health.

Storytellers who do their best work when disconnected from their Slack pingsΒ often opt to use a dedicated drafting device fromΒ ourΒ lineup.Β Just like a Kindle offers distraction-free reading, FreewriteΒ enables a writer to write distraction-freeΒ to their heart’s content.

This has led to the Freewrite community reporting that they average writing two to three times more words per hour on a single-purpose Freewrite device.

In other words: We can embraceΒ newΒ technology while also interrogating its effect on human beings and modern life.

Both are possible. I promise.Β 

We can embraceΒ newΒ technology while also interrogating its effect on human beings and modern life.

Integrating the Single-PurposeΒ PhilosophyΒ into Your Life

From higher productivity to less stress and better sleep, the data is pretty clear that we’d all benefit from less time on our smart devices.

We encourage you to explore the work being done at likeminded tech companies to see if you and your health could benefit from single-purpose technology. There are analogue changes you can make, too.

For example, you can use your bed for sleeping only. When you wake up, no scrolling through social media. Before bed, don’t cozy up to watch the newest episode of Bridgerton. No more enjoying a snack under your covers.

Your bed becomes designated for sleep and sleep alone. (Yes, sleep experts recommend this!)

If youΒ have a single-purpose tool you love, we want to hear from you! Share it on social media and tag us @getfreewrite.

STRUGGLE WITH DIGITAL OVERLOAD? YOU'RE NOT ALONE. READ ACCOUNTS FROM FELLOW FREEWRITERS ABOUT THEIR STRUGGLE TO USE TECH IN A HEALTHY WAY.

December 30, 2025 3 min read

It’s Freewrite’s favorite time of year. When dictionaries around the world examine language use of the previous year and select a β€œWord of the Year.”

Of course, there are many different dictionaries in use in the English language, and they all have different ideas about what word was the most influential or saw the most growth in the previous year. They individually review new slang and culturally relevant vocabulary, examine spikes or dips in usage, and pour over internet trend data.

Let’s see what some of the biggest dictionaries decided for 2025. And read to the end for a chance to submit your own Word of the Year β€” and win a Freewrite gift card.

[SUBMIT YOUR WORD OF THE YEAR]


Merriam-Webster: "slop"

Merriam-Webster chose "slop" as its Word of the Year for 2025 to describe "all that stuff dumped on our screens, captured in just four letters."

The dictionary lists "absurd videos, off-kilter advertising images, cheesy propaganda, fake news that looks pretty real, junky AI-written books, 'workslop' reports that waste coworkers’ time … and lots of talking cats" as examples of slop.

The original sense of the word "slop" from the 1700s was β€œsoft mud” and eventually evolved to mean "food waste" and "rubbish." 2025 linked the term to AI, and the rest is history.

Honorable mentions: conclave, gerrymander, touch grass, performative, tariff, 67.

Dictionary.com: "67"

The team at Dictionary.com likes to pick a word that serves as β€œa linguistic time capsule, reflecting social trends and global events that defined the year.”

For 2025, they decided that β€œword” was actually a number. Or two numbers, to be exact.

If you’re an old, like me, and don’t know many school-age children, you may not have heard β€œ67” in use. (Note that this is not β€œsixty-seven,” but β€œsix, seven.”)

Dictionary.com claims the origin of β€œ67” is a song called β€œDoot Doot (6 7)” by Skrilla, quickly made infamous by viral TikTok videos, most notably featuring a child who will for the rest of his life be known as the β€œ6-7 Kid.” But according to my nine-year-old cousin, the origins of something so mystical can’t ever truly be known.

(My third grade expert also demonstrated the accompanying signature hand gesture, where you place both hands palms up and alternately move up and down.)

And if you happen to find yourself in a fourth-grade classroom, watch your mouth, because there’s a good chance this term has been banned for the teacher’s sanity.

Annoyed yet? Don’t be. As Dictionary.com points out, 6-7 is a rather delightful example at how fast language can develop as a new generation joins the conversation.

Dictionary.com honorable mentions: agentic, aura farming, broligarchy, clanker, Gen Z stare, kiss cam, overtourism, tariff, tradwife.

Oxford Dictionary: "rage bait"

With input from more than 30,000 users and expert analysis, Oxford Dictionary chose "rage bait" for their word of the year.

Specifically, the dictionary pointed to 2025’s news cycle, online manipulation tactics, and growing awareness of where we spend our time and attention online.

While closely paralleling its etymological cousin "clickbait," rage bait more specifically denotes content that evokes anger, discord, or polarization.

Oxford's experts report that use of the term has tripled in the last 12 months.

Oxford Dictionary's honorable mentions:aura farming, biohack.

Cambridge Dictionary: "parasocial"

The Cambridge Dictionary examined a sustained trend of increased searches to choose "parasocial" as its Word of the Year.

Believe it or not, this term was coined by sociologists in 1956, combining β€œsocial” with the Greek-derived prefix para-, which in this case means β€œsimilar to or parallel to, but separate from.”

But interest in and use of the term exploded this year, finally moving from a mainly academic context to the mainstream.

Cambridge Dictionary's honorable mentions: slop, delulu, skibidi, tradwife

Freewrite: TBD

This year, the Freewrite Fam is picking our own Word of the Year.

Click below to submit what you think the Word of 2025 should be, and we'll pick one submission to receive a Freewrite gift card.

[SUBMIT HERE]Β 

--

Sources

December 18, 2025 7 min read

What can Jane Austen's personal letters teach writers of today?

December 10, 2025 6 min read

Singer-songwriter Abner James finds his creativity in the quiet freedom of analog tools. Learn how his creative process transcends different media.

Abner James went to school for film directing. But the success of the band he and his brother formed together, Eighty Ninety, knocked him onto a different trajectory.

The band has accrued more than 40 million streams since the release of their debut EP β€œElizabeth," and their work was even co-signed by Taylor Swift when the singer added Eighty Ninety to her playlist "Songs Taylor Loves.”

Now, Abner is returning to long-form writing in addition to songwriting, and with a change in media comes an examination of the creative process. We sat down to chat about what's the same β€” and what's different.Β 

ANNIE COSBY: Tell us about your songwriting process.

ABNER JAMES:Β The way I tend to write my songs is hunched over a guitar and just seeing what comes. Sounds become words become shapes. It's a very physical process that is really about turning my brain off.

And one of the things that occurred to me when I was traveling, actually, was that I would love to be able to do that but from a writing perspective. What would happen if I sat down and approached writing in the same way that I approached music? In a more intuitive and free-form kind of way? What would that dig up?

AC: That's basically the ethos of Freewrite.

AJ:Β Yes. We had just put out a record, and I was thinking about how to get into writing for the next one. It occurred to me that regardless of how I started, I always finished on a screen. And I wondered: what's the acoustic guitar version of writing?

Where there's not blue light hitting me in the face. Even if I'm using my Notes app, it's the same thing. It really gets me into a different mindset.

Β "I wondered: what's the acoustic guitar version of writing?"

I grew up playing piano. That was my first instrument. And I found an old typewriter at a thrift store, and I love it. It actually reminded me a lot of playing piano, the kind of physical, the feeling of it. And it was really fun, but pretty impractical, especially because I travel a fair amount.

And so I wondered, is there such a thing as a digital typewriter? And I googled it, and I found Freewrite.

AC: What about Freewrite helps you write?

AJ:I think, pragmatically, just the E Ink screen is a huge deal, because it doesn't exhaust me in the same way. And the idea of having a tool specifically set aside for the process is appealing in an aesthetic way but also a mental-emotional way. When it comes out, it's kind of like ... It's like having an office you work out of. It's just for that.

"The way I tend to write my songs is hunched over a guitar and just seeing what comes. Sounds become words become shapes. It's a very physical process that is really about turning my brain off."

And all of the pragmatic limitations β€” like you're not getting texts on it, and you're not doing all that stuff on the internet β€” that's really helpful, too. But just having the mindset....

When I pick up a guitar, or I sit down at the piano, it very much puts me into that space. Having a tool just for words does the same thing. I find that to be really cool and inspiring.

"When I pick up a guitar, or I sit down at the piano, it very much puts me into that space. Having a tool just for words does the same thing."

AC: So mentally it gets you ready for writing.

AJ: Yeah, and also, when you write a Microsoft Word, it looks so finished that it's hard to keep going. If every time I strummed a chord, I was hearing it back, mixed and mastered and produced...?

It's hard to stay in that space when I'm seeing it fully written out and formatted in, like, Times New Roman, looking all seriously back at me.

AC: I get that. I have terrible instincts to edit stuff over and over again and never finish a story.

AJ:Β  Also, the way you just open it and it's ready to go. So you don't have the stages of the computer turning on, that kind of puts this pressure, this tension on.

It's working at the edges in all these different ways that on their own could feel a little bit like it's not really necessary.Β All these amorphous things where you could look at it and be like, well, I don't really need any of those. But they add up to a critical mass that actually is significant.

And sometimes, if I want to bring it on a plane, I've found it's replaced reading for me. Rather than pick up a book or bring a book on the plane, I bring Traveler and just kind of hang out in that space and see if anything comes up.

I've found that it's kind of like writing songs on a different instrument, you get different styles of music that you wouldn't have otherwise. I've found that writing from words towards music, I get different kinds of songs than I have in the past, which has been interesting.

In that way, like sitting at a piano, you just write differently than you do on a guitar, or even a bass, because of the things those instruments tend to encourage or that they can do.

It feels almost like a little synthesizer, a different kind of instrument that has unlocked a different kind of approach for me.

"I've found that it's kind of like writing songs on a different instrument, you get different styles of music that you wouldn't have otherwise... [Traveler] feels almost like a little synthesizer, a different kind of instrument that has unlocked a different kind of approach for me."

AC: As someone who doesn't know the first thing about writing music, that's fascinating. It's all magic to me.

AJ:Β Yeah.

AC: What else are you interested in writing?

AJ:Β I went to school for film directing. That was kind of what I thought I was going to do. And then my brother and I started the band and that kind of happened first and knocked me onto a different track for a little while after college.

Growing up, though, writing was my way into everything. In directing, I wanted to be in control of the thing that I wrote. And in music, it was the same β€” the songwriting really feels like it came from that same place. And then the idea of writing longer form, like fiction, almost feels just like the next step from song to EP to album to novel.

For whatever reason, that started feeling like a challenge that would be deeply related to the kinds of work that we do in the studio.

AC: Do you have any advice for aspiring songwriters?

AJ:Β This sounds like a cliche, but it's totally true: whatever success that I've had as a songwriter β€” judge that for yourself β€” but whatever success I have had, has been directly proportional to just writing the song that I wanted to hear.

What I mean by that is, even if you're being coldly, cynically, late-stage capitalist about it, it's by far the most success I've had. The good news is that you don't have to choose. And in fact, when you start making those little compromises, or even begin to inch in that direction, it just doesn't work. So you can forget about it.

Just make music you want to hear. And that will be the music that resonates with most people.

I think there's a temptation to have an imaginary focus group in your head of like 500 people. But the problem is all those people are fake. They're not real. None of those people are actually real people. You're a focus group of one, you're one real person. There are more real people in that focus group than in the imaginary one.

And I just don't think that we're that different, in the end. So that would be my advice.

AC: That seems like generally great creative advice. Because fiction writers talk about that too, right? Do you write to market or do you write the book you want to read. Same thing. And that imaginary focus group has been debilitating for me. I have to silence that focus group before I can write.

AJ:Β Absolutely.

"I think there's a temptation to have an imaginary focus group in your head of like 500 people. But the problem is all those people are fake... You're a focus group of one, you're one real person. There are more real people in that focus group than in the imaginary one."

--

Learn more about Abner James, his brother, and their band, Eighty Ninety, on Instagram.