overlaylink

What Multitasking Is Doing To Your Brain

Concetta Cucchiarelli
November 15, 2024 | 3 min read

Today's world is becoming increasingly busy. Our to-do list grows every second.

There are three ways to deal with this never-ending growth.

  1. We can reduce the number of things to do.
  2. Increase the number of people working on the same list.
  3. Become faster at what we do.

Usually, we choose the last option, and we achieve it by doing more than one thing at a time. This is the definition of multitasking.

But did you know multitasking isn’t real? What we’re actually talking about is divided attention.

Multitasking Is a Lie

Most of us should know by now that multitasking isn’t real. Studies show that when “multitasking,” we are not actually processing multiple tasks simultaneously — we’re switching from one task or object to another very, very fast.

Imagine looking for a parking spot on a one-way street with parking on both sides. You have the illusion of seeing both left and right at the same time, but what you’re actually doing is turning your head to alternating sides.

The same happens with our attention. Professor Sophie Leroy defined the mental phenomenon of moving from one task to another as "attention residue." When you switch tasks, you’re bringing with you the last part, the residue, of what you were just doing — and vice versa.

Most of us should know by now that multitasking isn’t real. Studies show that when “multitasking,” we are not actually processing multiple tasks simultaneously — we’re switching from one task or object to another very, very fast.

It's like when you see a bright flash, and you can then only see black spots for a few moments. Your task switching is creating black spots that impair your “vision” when you move on to another task.

Of course, this is a very simplified version of the concept. Still, it's helpful to explain why switching our attention like this, or having divided attention, actually takes more time and energy, and results in more mistakes. This is known as “switching costs.”

In addition, we retain less information when multitasking. In fact, when we do two things at a time, we rely less on the part of the brain that lets us store and retrieve information, so we actually accumulate less knowledge.

That's why it's just an illusion that you can learn something by listening to a podcast while working. It's like watching just the highlights instead of the whole football match. And the number of details we collect determines how much we remember.

Switching our attention like this, or having divided attention, actually takes more time and energy, and results in more mistakes. 

It Gets Worse

Recent studies, focused in particular on a specific type of multitasking called multimedia tasking (multitasking on more than one device), showed that continually dividing our attention physically changes the structure of our brain, affecting intelligence, emotion control, anxiety, and overall social-emotional well-being.

Multimedia tasking ... physically changes the structure of our brain, affecting intelligence, emotion control, anxiety, and overall social-emotional well-being.

So, not only do we not save time and not retain information while multitasking, we are also damaging our brains.

Yet we keep doing it. Why?

So, not only do we not save time and not retain information while multitasking, we are also damaging our brains.

There are definitely some cognitive biases at work here. For example, we tend to consider ourselves better and more able than others, so we may think, "This may be true for ordinary people, but not me." We also often underestimate the time and effort actually required to do something.

In my experience as a strategist, I've seen many people multitask just to create a perceived sense of busyness, even if they know that it is just an illusion. Other people may want to avoid their thoughts — after all, thinking is the hardest task of all — so the busier, the better.

Knowing why you multitask can help you stop and choose one of the other options: work with more people and learn to delegate, or be more conscious about what to put on you to-do list.

[BACK TO “WHY FOCUS IS DYING”]

January 28, 2026 1 min read

Write every day with the Freewrite team in February.

January 09, 2026 2 min read

A new year means a whole new crop of work is entering the public domain. And that means endless opportunities for retellings, spoofs, adaptations, and fan fiction.

December 30, 2025 3 min read

It’s Freewrite’s favorite time of year. When dictionaries around the world examine language use of the previous year and select a “Word of the Year.”

Of course, there are many different dictionaries in use in the English language, and they all have different ideas about what word was the most influential or saw the most growth in the previous year. They individually review new slang and culturally relevant vocabulary, examine spikes or dips in usage, and pour over internet trend data.

Let’s see what some of the biggest dictionaries decided for 2025. And read to the end for a chance to submit your own Word of the Year — and win a Freewrite gift card.

[SUBMIT YOUR WORD OF THE YEAR]


Merriam-Webster: "slop"

Merriam-Webster chose "slop" as its Word of the Year for 2025 to describe "all that stuff dumped on our screens, captured in just four letters."

The dictionary lists "absurd videos, off-kilter advertising images, cheesy propaganda, fake news that looks pretty real, junky AI-written books, 'workslop' reports that waste coworkers’ time … and lots of talking cats" as examples of slop.

The original sense of the word "slop" from the 1700s was “soft mud” and eventually evolved to mean "food waste" and "rubbish." 2025 linked the term to AI, and the rest is history.

Honorable mentions: conclave, gerrymander, touch grass, performative, tariff, 67.

Dictionary.com: "67"

The team at Dictionary.com likes to pick a word that serves as “a linguistic time capsule, reflecting social trends and global events that defined the year.”

For 2025, they decided that “word” was actually a number. Or two numbers, to be exact.

If you’re an old, like me, and don’t know many school-age children, you may not have heard “67” in use. (Note that this is not “sixty-seven,” but “six, seven.”)

Dictionary.com claims the origin of “67” is a song called “Doot Doot (6 7)” by Skrilla, quickly made infamous by viral TikTok videos, most notably featuring a child who will for the rest of his life be known as the “6-7 Kid.” But according to my nine-year-old cousin, the origins of something so mystical can’t ever truly be known.

(My third grade expert also demonstrated the accompanying signature hand gesture, where you place both hands palms up and alternately move up and down.)

And if you happen to find yourself in a fourth-grade classroom, watch your mouth, because there’s a good chance this term has been banned for the teacher’s sanity.

Annoyed yet? Don’t be. As Dictionary.com points out, 6-7 is a rather delightful example at how fast language can develop as a new generation joins the conversation.

Dictionary.com honorable mentions: agentic, aura farming, broligarchy, clanker, Gen Z stare, kiss cam, overtourism, tariff, tradwife.

Oxford Dictionary: "rage bait"

With input from more than 30,000 users and expert analysis, Oxford Dictionary chose "rage bait" for their word of the year.

Specifically, the dictionary pointed to 2025’s news cycle, online manipulation tactics, and growing awareness of where we spend our time and attention online.

While closely paralleling its etymological cousin "clickbait," rage bait more specifically denotes content that evokes anger, discord, or polarization.

Oxford's experts report that use of the term has tripled in the last 12 months.

Oxford Dictionary's honorable mentions:aura farming, biohack.

Cambridge Dictionary: "parasocial"

The Cambridge Dictionary examined a sustained trend of increased searches to choose "parasocial" as its Word of the Year.

Believe it or not, this term was coined by sociologists in 1956, combining “social” with the Greek-derived prefix para-, which in this case means “similar to or parallel to, but separate from.”

But interest in and use of the term exploded this year, finally moving from a mainly academic context to the mainstream.

Cambridge Dictionary's honorable mentions: slop, delulu, skibidi, tradwife

Freewrite: TBD

This year, the Freewrite Fam is picking our own Word of the Year.

Click below to submit what you think the Word of 2025 should be, and we'll pick one submission to receive a Freewrite gift card.

[SUBMIT HERE] 

--

Sources