Stop Overthinking Everything: Advice for Writers

Annie Cosby
September 18, 2024 | 5 min read

Do you ask yourself the same questions about your current work over and over again, making no headway whatsoever? Or maybe you find yourself sitting in front of your story, mind spinning, making no progress?

This likely means you’re overthinking it.

We spoke with writing expert K.M. Weiland about this common writer problem and how you can overcome it. 

K.M. Weiland writes historical and speculative fiction — usually a mix between the two, such as dieselpunk and gaslamp fantasy — so she knows a thing or two about complex stories and themes.

Eleven books in, she also knows a thing or two about writing. That’s what led her to create HelpingWritersBecomeAuthors.com and her acclaimed writing guides, Structuring Your Novel and Creating Character Arcs.

As a self-proclaimed outliner, she was our go-to for a common question we hear from writers:

How do you know when you’re overthinking things? And how do you escape that cycle?

 

AC: First off: You're a plotter, not a pantser. That involves a lot of thinking.

KM: I’m fascinated by systems and organization, which is what I study and share on my website and podcast, as well as my writing-craft books. So it's no surprise I’m a plot-forward planner. Outlining is my favorite part of the process.

I write extensive outlines that, in some ways, are more of my rough draft. This part of the process is no-pressure. It’s just a stream-of-conscious conversation with myself as I ramble through the possibilities of my story.

At this point in time, almost twenty years and eleven novels on, I’ve developed an in-depth process, which I’ve written about on my blog and in my book Outlining Your Novel. I start out with general brainstorming, then move on to character sketches, worldbuilding, and finally scene outlines, before starting research (if necessary) and the first draft.

I write extensive outlines that, in some ways, are more of my rough draft. This part of the process is no-pressure. It’s just a stream-of-conscious conversation with myself as I ramble through the possibilities of my story.

AC: Interesting that there's freewriting in your outlining process. So where's the line? How does a writer know they're overthinking things?

KM: I like to sing the little ditty, “If you’re happy and you know it, overthink!”

There is an important distinction between overthinking and developing excellent critical thinking skills. One of the best ways I know to do the latter is to focus on the quality of questions you’re asking yourself.

If you’re asking good questions, you’re not overthinking.

But when you’re just swimming in circles of self-criticism or perfectionism, then that — in my experience — is when you know you’ve crossed the line into overthinking.

Overthinking is almost always the emergent of two different causes. The first is simply a lack of knowledge. When we don’t have enough context to help us ask the right questions, this inevitably leads to us circling the same ideas over and over again, unless and until we find a thread to pull.

The second cause of overthinking is perfectionism. Writers often ask me how they can know when an outline or a first draft is “finished.” My somewhat tongue-in-cheek answer is always, “When you reach the end.”

But perfectionism can make it difficult to know when you’ve reached that point.

But when you’re just swimming in circles of self-criticism or perfectionism, then that — in my experience — is when you know you’ve crossed the line into overthinking.

AC: What are the dangers of overthinking in your writing? What do you risk losing?

KM: Again, it’s a fine line. If we underthink, then we risk producing work that is far below our own capabilities. We aren’t pushing ourselves or looking inside for our deepest truths and most original ideas.

However, creativity is a sometimes capricious state of being. It operates best from within “the zone” — when our brains are in Alpha state, which is the opposite of the busy mind we general experience in Beta.

Overthinking, born of perfectionism, can also send us into discouragement. Continually asking ourselves generic questions that lack useful answers (e.g., “is this good enough?” or “should I tweak this just to see what happens?” or “is my dialogue stupid?”) just wears us out. We never get anywhere useful with such lines of thought, and they almost always end up triggering our insecurities rather than actually improving the work.

Continually asking ourselves generic questions that lack useful answers (e.g., “is this good enough?” or “should I tweak this just to see what happens?” or “is my dialogue stupid?”) just wears us out. 

AC: So how do you stop those lines of thinking?

KM: The first step is simply to keep learning. Broaden your context of storytelling knowledge. The more you know about stories, what works, and what doesn’t, the more intentional you can be in the questions you are asking yourself about your own writing.

You can’t think your way to a good ending if you have no idea of the storytelling principles (such as plot structure) that create a good ending. But you can feed your mind more knowledge, as well as exploring your own storytelling instincts through creative experience.

Part of this growth includes the second step, which is learning to ask high-quality questions. Instead of generic questions, such as those I mentioned previously, strive to activate your critical thinking skills (which, again, is the opposite of overthinking) to ask very specific questions.

This requires growing your ability to truly understand your own instincts. Instead of overthinking, ask yourself what you’re feeling about your story. If you have an uncomfortable niggle, where is it coming from? Is it coming from your own insecurities or from a legitimate lack of knowledge about how to do something? Or is it coming from a specific problem in the story that you can get dig deeper into?

Finally, addressing your relationship with the toxic inner critic is vital. A healthy inner critic guides us toward legitimate growth and improvement, while a toxic inner critic only tears us and our work down. Most overthinking falls into the latter category.

A healthy inner critic guides us toward legitimate growth and improvement, while a toxic inner critic only tears us and our work down.

AC: Couldn't agree more that mastering that relationship with your inner critic is definitely important. Any last advice for writers struggling with overthinking?

KM: Don’t overthink the fact that you’re overthinking! Seriously. Take a step back — or maybe even some time off if necessary. Let your unconscious brain take over. It has all the good answers anyway.

And if it just isn’t coming up with what you need, then it probably needs to be fed more information. Take some time off to fill your well by reading whatever feels most pertinent. Answers always come when we’re patient. They’re not always the answers we’re hoping for, but as soon as we ask the right question, the answer will appear.

You can find more writing advice from me at HelpingWritersBecomeAuthors.com, where I publish in-depth posts and podcasts that include the critical thinking and important knowledge writers need to create the context for asking the right questions.

Recommended articles

More recommended articles for you

September 18, 2024 3 min read

Calling all writers... Looking for a chance to showcase your talent and get a little recognition? Look no further than these open writing contests!

September 05, 2024 7 min read

Everyone has a pandemic story because it's hard to forget. I remember the quickness of it all — societal norms flipping, turning, and somersaulting, which still makes my head spin. "Stuff is gonna get weird," I remember telling my friend. "Especially art."

August 29, 2024 4 min read

Right now, the choice for a writer to use artificial intelligence (AI) or not has been largely a personal one. Some view it as a killer of creativity, while others see it as an endless well of inspiration.

But what if, in the future, your choice had larger implications on the state of literature as a whole?

This is the question that’s being raised from a new study by the University of Exeter Business School: If you could use AI to improve your own writing, at the expense of the overall literary experience, would you?

Let’s explore some context before you answer.

The Set Up

The 2024 study recruited 293 writers to write an eight-sentence “micro” story. The participants were split into three groups:

  • Writing by human brainpower only
  • The opportunity to get one AI-generated idea to inspire their writing
  • The opportunity to get up to five AI-generated ideas to inspire their writing

Then, 600 evaluators judged how creative these short stories were. The results confirmed a widely accepted idea but also offered a few surprising findings.

Prompts from AI Can Jumpstart the Creative Process

Right off the bat, the reviewers rated the AI-guided stories as being more original, better written, and more enjoyable to read. (Interesting to note that they did not find them funnier than the fully human-inspired stories.)

This actually isn’t that surprising. Most writers know the “blank page dread” at the beginning of a project. Even as I write this, I can’t help but wonder, “If I had been tasked with writing an eight-sentence story, what the heck would I have written about?”

Many writers share this sense of needing to pick the “right” story to tell. And that uniquely human concept of perfectionism can end up actually inhibiting our creative process.

A prompt, then, can help us quickly clear this mental hurdle. To test this, I’ll give you one, courtesy of ChatGPT: “Write a story about a teenager who discovers a mysterious journal that reveals hidden secrets about their town, leading them on an unexpected adventure to uncover the truth.”

Can you feel your creative juices flowing already?

Since its release, AI has been celebrated for its ability to assist in idea generation; and this study confirms how effective using artificial intelligence in this way can be for writers — some, it seems, more than others.

AI-Generated Ideas Helped Less Creative Writers More

It doesn’t feel great to judge a writer’s creative prowess, but for this study, researchers needed to do just that. Prior to writing their short stories, the writers took a test to measure their creativity.

Researchers found that those considered less creative did substantially better when given AI-generated ideas — to the point where getting the full five ideas from AI “effectively equalizes the creativity scores across less and more creative writers.”

This isn’t the case just for writing. Another study by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship WZ also found that AI tools most benefit employees with weaker skills.

So is AI leveling the playing field between okay and great writers? It seems it may be. But before we lament, there’s one more finding that proves using AI isn’t all perks.

AI-Aided Stories Were More Similar — And Needed to Be Credited

The researchers took a step back to look at all the AI-supported stories collectively. And what did they find?

The AI-assisted stories were more similar as a whole, compared to the fully human-written stories.

Additionally, when reviewers were told that a story was enhanced by an AI idea, they “imposed an ownership penalty of at least 25%,” even indicating that “the content creators, on which the models were based, should be compensated.”

This leads us to that all-important question about AI-assisted work: who owns the content?

According to Originality.AI, an AI and plagiarism detector, “When there’s a combination of AI and human-generated elements, the human elements may receive copyright protection if they meet the requirements.”

So right now, if a writer uses AI to generate ideas — but writes the content themselves — they retain rights to the work.

However, Originality.AI even admits that “the legal system is having a hard time keeping up” with the rapid adoption of artificial intelligence. Time will only tell what AI regulations will look like in a few years.

What Does an AI-Assisted Literary Future Look Like?

The researchers from the University of Exeter Business School study raise an interesting point about what the future landscape for writers may look like. If droves of authors begin using AI to come up with ideas, we may end up with a lot of well-written yet dime-a-dozen stories.

So will human beings choose the easier, but less diverse, path? Or will we stick to fighting through writer’s block armed with nothing but our own brain?

Or, a third option: can we somehow learn to harness AI to supercharge our writing process without sacrificing the wholly unique creativity that infuses human creation?

That’s one question that even ChatGPT can’t answer.

Editor's Note: Artificial intelligence may have already transformed writing, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't be in control of your own words. Read Astrohaus Founder Adam Leeb's statement on AI and privacy.