overlaylink

Writing with Aphantasia

Annie Cosby
October 10, 2024 | 8 min read

When you read and write, do you visualize the scenes in your head, a bit like a movie? Or do you see nothing?

Join us in an exploration of aphantasia — or the inability to visualize — and the way different brains experience storytelling.

Author Mariel Pomeroy loved reading when she was younger. She remembers seeing Twilight and being astonished that you could create a whole fantasy world that other people fell in love with. Could she create something like that?

But she never tried, and somewhere through the years, she stopped reading.

“If I found a book that I really got into, it was my favorite thing,” she says. “But finding that was hard for me because of my lack of visuals. If I didn’t vibe very quickly with the prose or the characters, it was hard for me to stay — it just felt like school.”

Mariel is talking about aphantasia.

Aphantasia is a phenomenon in which people cannot visualize imagery. This is particularly apparent during storytelling, like reading and writing. It’s the only way Mariel’s mind has ever worked. In fact, she didn’t know other people “saw” things in their mind at all.

In 2020, when she picked up Jennifer L. Armentrout’s From Blood and Ash, Mariel remembered her old dream of writing. “I started to go for it,” she says. “Just writing.”

But what does “just writing” look like for someone with aphantasia?

ANNIE COSBY: So let’s start at the beginning. What does it mean that you have aphantasia?

MARIEL POMEROY: It means I can't “see” anything in my head. It’s just black up there. I can't visualize anything. I can't see the stuff I'm writing, or the stuff I read, either.

I don't have the mental imagery of books, you know, they're never like movies for me. I don't visualize how the body would move, or whatever, I can’t see it.

And people have different degrees of aphantasia too. I see nothing. But I was talking to one of my friends, and they can see colors and shapes and people, but the people don't have faces. Another friend sees so much, she can distinguish the texture of clothes.

It all just depends on your brain, which is fascinating.

It means I can't “see” anything in my head. It’s just black up there. 

AC: I’ve seen the spectrum illustrated with that meme of an apple or the graphic of a bird.

MP: Yeah, those are useful tools to explain it.

AC: As a person who does see the “movie” of a story in my head, the visuals, I didn’t even know some people experienced reading and writing differently until very recently.

MP: I didn't know aphantasia was unusual until about two years ago, honestly. Even being in the social media space, I thought when people talked about “seeing” things in their head, it was metaphorical.

But for me, reading and writing are very much in-body experiences. I'm just reading the words, and I can kind of “hear” the words, but that’s it. I'm still very much just sitting here.

AC: Do you think aphantasia affects how you write?

MP: I think it’s harder for me to imagine a story. I tend to have one core idea, and from there it's all on vibes. Whatever feels good. It's not visual at all. It’s always a feeling.

It’s been the same with all my books. They were never approved for publishing until every chapter felt a certain way. My writing is very much based on emotions.

That means I sometimes bumble my way through the story. Often, I don't know where the book is going to end. I just start.

I'm going to find the ending as I write it. And as I find out more, as I go, the characters are telling me what's going to happen.

I think it’s harder for me to imagine a story. I tend to have one core idea, and from there it's all on vibes. Whatever feels good.

AC: That sounds like freewriting in the truest sense.

MP: Yeah. That’s truly what it is. I like to say i’s writing like I drive.

I'm a big driver. I love listening to music and just driving. It appeases my brain somehow. The destination is great and everything, but I prefer the journey of it.

That’s how writing is for me. I'll get to the destination eventually, but it may take me much longer than it was supposed to. And I enjoy it.

I have so many random chapters that will never go anywhere because I had to try out that direction just to see if that would feel better. Because all of the ideas technically worked on paper, but I didn’t know if it would feel right until I wrote it.

And so usually I write so many extra words just because I have to try different avenues and see what might work best.

It's kind of like slowly unfurling this ball of yarn.

It's kind of like slowly unfurling this ball of yarn.

AC: That's so interesting to me because I'm a dedicated plotter currently trying to explore other ways of writing.

MP: I've tried my hardest to plot, and I cannot. When I did, either immediately the storyline changed, or it didn't feel like I could be creative anymore. It felt really forced.

AC: For me, plotting feels good when I’m doing it, but when I finish the story, it’s like, well, that was predictable … because I predicted it. But when I force myself to freewrite, I'm like, where the heck did that idea come from?!

MP: Yeah! I don't want to get boxed in by structure. If I think about that too much while drafting, if I'm like, “OK, around this word count, I should be here,” that creativity just goes right out the window.

For first drafts, I can't focus on any of that. It's very much a task for revising.

AC: I mean, the point of structure at the end of the day is to make people feel something, right? And with your aphantasia, it seems like you're already going on feel.

MP: Sure. And sometimes I get it wrong. I think we've all heard this before, but draft one is you telling yourself the story. You've heard me speak now — my stories are long-winded. Oftentimes, I have to backtrack, and some things don't make sense, so I revise.

But that first draft should be full-on unhinged. It should be crazy!

I have first drafts where there's just parentheses that say “put emotions here” or “it’d be cool to do this scene right here.”

That first draft should be full-on unhinged. It should be crazy!

AC: I do that too!

MP: Because I couldn't think of something at the time but didn’t want to stop. Later, when I’m revising, it’s super helpful.

AC: I literally write, “Finish this later.”

MP: Every writer should figure out what to do when they get stuck. If you’re a plotter, you sort of know what direction you’re going, but if you’re not linear and you hit a wall, you’re completely lost.

My friend and I came up with a technique for getting out of that. We call it “writing a clown walking down the street.” What that means is writing something that makes absolutely no sense.

Something fully out of pocket, something that’s definitely not going in the book because it's just so random — like a clown walking down the street, with absolutely no reason for him to be there. There's no circus here. You don't know why there's a clown walking down the street, but he is.

Often, that kind of shock distracts your mind enough that it’s able to hurdle the block you were facing and you get a different idea. It’s like a cheat code to tap into the creative side of writing again.

Sometimes we forget about that! Writing is creativity. But there’s also so much of it that is analytical at the end of the day. A lot of it is numbers, like you're breaking down your word count and your structure at 50%, etc. I think when that takes over, it gets ahold of our creativity and drowns it a little bit.

We have to be kids about it to get it back. Write a clown walking down the street.

Sometimes we forget about that! Writing is creativity. But there’s also so much of it that is analytical ... I think when that takes over, it gets ahold of our creativity and drowns it a little bit. We have to be kids about it to get it back.

Mariel Pomeroy and her Traveler
Mariel Pomeroy writing on her Freewrite Traveler.

AC: So we’ve talked about how aphantasia affects your writing process, but do you think it affects your actual writing? Does it make your work different from other writers in a concrete way?

MP: That's a great question. I love poetry, so I try to make my chapters feel a little bit like poetry. I’m focused on the aesthetics of words and sentences.

I should add that I'm horrible at grammar. *laughs* But I do like the aesthetics of it all. Using melodic words, the sounds and the visuals of the words themselves. Prose is very, very important to me.

Also, I love descriptors, and I do think that comes from the blindness of it. But it also makes people surprised when they learn I can’t see anything in my head. They’re like “I could definitely see everything that you described really well.” But for me, I was just working.

AC: What’s your biggest piece of advice for other writers, whether they have aphantasia or not?

MP: Just trust yourself. At the end of the day, your mind — your brain — already knows what the story is.

Even if you don't, your brain does, and it's feeding it to you in bite-sized pieces.

So even if you feel like you're in this dark tunnel just tapping around, it is a tunnel. There is an exit, and you'll get there. You just have to trust that whatever ideas come to you, there’s a reason for them.

You just have to lean into that.

Which I think has been the hardest thing. It's easy for me to tell you, you know, trust yourself, but even when I’m trusting the process, I'm like, “What are we doing? I don't understand what's going on. I have no idea where I’m going with this. Why can’t it just be linear?”

The simple answer is that's not how my brain works. It just wants to feed it to me differently.

At the end of the day, your mind — your brain — already knows what the story is. Even if you don't, your brain does, and it's feeding it to you in bite-sized pieces.

AC: That’s really wise. I think we often try to follow writing process advice from writers we admire, with good intentions, but everybody’s brain is different.

MP: Absolutely. So the question is: What kind of storyteller are you?

If you're telling your friends a story, do you get sidetracked? Do you lose the plot for a second and go on a tangent and talk about something else completely? Because in the first draft, that's what you're doing. You're telling yourself this story.

So the question is: What kind of storyteller are you?

Take our quiz to find out what kind of storyteller you are.

Follow Mariel on social media to learn more about her books, writing with aphantasia, and her unique writing journey.

September 02, 2026 6 min read

Kentucky farmer and poet Wendell Berry entranced readers across the globe with his poems extolling the power of knowing the natural world. 

For writers who want to do the same, there’s deep knowledge to be gleaned from Berry.

August 26, 2026 5 min read

Freewriter Mike Somerby left a lucrative marketing career in e-commerce to start a print-only literary magazine by and for Montanans. Yes, you read that right.

We sat down with Mike to find out how ... and why.

Mike Somerby identifies as a writer — with some reservation.

"I think all who write are 'writers,'" he says, "even if the writing itself amounts to a simple letter to a friend or a personal journal entry."

We couldn't agree more. And we're thrilled that this particular writer writes his essays on Freewrite. Maybe that's why we felt comfortable asking him:

What inspires a professional brand marketer to leave his 9-5 and jump feet-first into the literary world of Bozeman, Montana?

Luckily, he was happy to tell us.

AC: Before we get into the lit mag, it actually isn't your first foray into the literary community, right?

MS: For about ten years — the lion's share of my professional chapter — I worked, in some capacity, as a brand marketer. Last spring, while enduring a particularly grueling stint as CMO for a Montanan e-commerce brand (yes, those exist), I found myself revisited by the remarks of an old journalism school professor: from his perspective, journalism students who apply their storytelling talents toward PR and marketing have crossed over to "the dark side."

While I find this a touch heavy-handed, I get the point, and I believe his notion resurfaced to meet the moment: we live in a world sorely hurting for analog (human) creativity and high-quality longform.

So I quit, traveled west with my dog in a 1986 U-Haul I'd converted into a camper, and plotted.

Step one: I founded Pulphead, a lounge (named after John Jeremiah Sullivan’s seminal 2011 essay collection) where Bozeman writers commune and grind out their prose until 2 a.m. Entry is a flat $5, which comes with unlimited drip coffee and tea.

Step two: leverage the Pulphead regulars and its online following to secure contributors for my new literary magazine, ANEMONE. Thus far, everything is going to plan.

We live in a world sorely hurting for analog (human) creativity and high-quality longform.

AC: Why do you think it's so important to create and preserve these spaces for authentic writing?

MS: Writing is a solitary act. Nonetheless, younger generations, in particular, struggle to forge IRL community in the way older generations might understand as an ordinary facet of being human.

By building a space that is as homey as it is supportive of their literary interests, we’re not only helping these individuals find their birds of a feather, but also providing them with a dojo that mandates setting aside blocks of time away from phones, home lives, and the other distractions. Win-win?

Incidentally, Livingston boasts the highest per-capita concentration of professional writers anywhere in the country. Couple this with another statistic — that Montana has more bookstores per capita than any other state — and it becomes clear southwest Montana is as fertile a place as any to invest in literature and its related industries.


AC: That's so interesting. What have you learned from being in community with creatives in Bozeman?

MS: In terms of writing, I've learned plenty. What has excited me most, however, is what I’ve learned from a small group of Indigenous women who come to the shop to write poetry and make beaded clothing in the traditions of their respective tribes (most notably, Crow, Cheyenne, Shoshone).

This is a group I’d otherwise have limited opportunity to engage with outside of Pulphead, and learning about their traditions, beliefs, hopes — even a little vocabulary — through firsthand conversation has proved incredibly edifying.

AC: And you mentioned you've seen Freewrites pop up in Pulphead. You use one, right?

MS: Yes. About seven years ago, not long after moving to Montana from New York, I purchased an Olivetti Lettera 32 typewriter from eBay. It appeared that a romanticizing of my newfound remoteness had rekindled my interest in writing.

I loved the mechanical feel and distraction-free interface, but the inability to edit line by line proved a notable annoyance for a mind habituated to modern computers. A few years down the road, some digging for alternatives led me to a blog post about smart/electronic typewriters. Voilà.

I purchased a Freewrite Gen3 Smart Typewriter, and I've been hooked ever since.

AC: That's awesome. So tell us about ANEMONE. What is it?

MS: ANEMONE is a print-only magazine (printed in a traditional broadsheet newspaper format). As for for theme, broadly, the world as told by Montanans. Short fiction, creative nonfiction, poetry, reportage, photography, and visiual illustrations comprise the submission categories.

AC: Print-only!

MS: Print is only dying because we let it.

AC: Is there a story about the name?

MS: Most people know the word anemone to describe a family of flowers — a 200-plus-species family of buttercups, comprising varieties both wild and domesticated. Dubbed “windflowers,” their delicate petals are said to blow open in the breeze; the ancient Greek word anemos means “wind.” I was drawn to the metaphorical value of beauty and how it can be revealed to us through an invisible force.

To add another layer, when I was a boy my father and I would spend weekends at the beaches north of San Francisco, where I was born and raised until I was seven. We would study the massive turqoise, kelly green, and purple sea anemones clinging to rocks left exposed by the receding Pacific tides (as to why, I can't say, outside of them looking funny, almost alien). A good memory.

Finally, “Anemone” is the name of an exquisite song by The Brian Jonestown Massacre, an irreverent and controversial rock band led by Anton Newcombe, an obsessive creative who rejects the surrender of culture and art to commercial interests. The track has a hold on me. It's like a portal to another era.

AC: Why do you think this sort of analog creativity is important?

MS:  I'm told the unending deluge of digital interface is leaving humans less and less capable of “deep work.” Will we ever know the difference?

Will we recognize what a society incapable of deep work looks like compared with those that came before it? Or will the transition manifest as a gradual degradation of quality, much as Coca-Cola was slowly, but surely, divorced from real sugar, such that to taste what Coke used to be like, one must order a Mexican Coke, still made with real cane sugar?

For me, analog perspective (and any creativity wrung from it) is rooted in continuity, tangibility, lived experience, slowness, spatial relation, nuance, emphasis on process, and grace for imperfection — antithetical to one of replicability, speed, binary outcomes, predictability, and optimization.

I prefer the former, and I suspect those who prefer the latter don't read or write much — life is a beautiful, taxing mess, and good writers find merit in this duality.

For me, analog perspective (and any creativity wrung from it) is rooted in continuity, tangibility, lived experience, slowness, spatial relation, nuance, emphasis on process, and grace for imperfection — antithetical to one of replicability, speed, binary outcomes, predictability, and optimization.

AC: Who is invited to submit to ANEMONE?

MS: We do limit submissions to Montanans, past and present, though we will feature writers from other states should the content of their writing bear an obvious relation to Montana — a requirement not imposed on Montanan writers.

All information regarding submissions can be found at www.anemonereview.com, along with all other facets of the magazine.

August 26, 2026 1 min read

Love the Freewrite 500? Here are 3 more writing contests for competitive short fiction writers.

1) Writers' Hour Magazine Prompts

The London Writer's Salon (a global writing group — no London residence necessary!) regularly host a writing contest via their Writers' Hour Magazine. Want to know a secret? Their September theme is all about freewriting.

Join them for a free workshop, Introduction to Freewriting, on Thursday, September 3, and get all the details about the contest.

The winner of the contest will win something Freewrite-shaped. 👀

2) NYC Midnight Challenges

This organization (again, no affiliation with NYC necessary) regularly hosts short story contests. Their next challenge is all about writing a rhyming story.

Learn more and register here.

Note: NYC Midnight writing contests generally have a fee to enter.

3) Henshaw Press Short Story Competition

This short story competition is open to anyone over age 16. And the best part? There is a cash prize, and profits go to charity.

Learn more here.