overlaylink

El poder del sexo: un vistazo al género favorito de Internet

Molly Tullis
septiembre 28, 2024 | 6 lectura mínima

En 2023, las novelas románticas generaron más de 1.440 millones de dólares en ingresos , lo que las convierte en el género de ficción con mayores ingresos.

Si bien el género romántico ha sido un éxito durante décadas, en los últimos años se ha producido un auge en las ventas. Se vendieron 39 millones de ejemplares impresos de novelas románticas en los 12 meses anteriores a mayo de 2023, lo que representa un aumento del 50 % con respecto al año anterior.

Entonces, ¿qué hay detrás de este huracán editorial?

La digitalización del romance

El romance de puertas abiertas, o "obsceno", es un género de novelas que contiene escenas sexuales explícitas, además de la trama. El término "erótica" describe libros compuestos casi en su totalidad por escenas explícitas con mínima trama o detalles adicionales. (Estas definiciones serán importantes más adelante. ¿Entendido?) Estas dos subcategorías dominan la industria actualmente, por varias razones.

En primer lugar, consideremos la expansión de los espacios de lectura en línea, que han atraído a lectores más jóvenes. Los principales lectores del género romántico solían tener entre 35 y 54 años, pero ahora se ha reducido a entre 18 y 44. ¡Gracias, BookTok y Bookstagram!

Además, el mundo se ha digitalizado, y el sector editorial no es la excepción. Si bien la literatura obscena impresa y las novelas románticas de puertas abiertas han existido desde la antigüedad , en los últimos años, la transición a los libros electrónicos, los lectores electrónicos y el Kindle Unlimited de Amazon ha impulsado un aumento masivo en la disponibilidad de novelas románticas de puertas abiertas. Sin embargo, el término "literatura obscena" todavía se usa a veces con un tono despectivo.

(¡La palabra “smut” es una palabra del siglo XVI!)

Las lectoras de novelas románticas (incluidos todos los subgéneros) siempre han sido mayoritariamente mujeres y suelen estar sujetas a estereotipos y al ostracismo. Piensen en el estereotipo de la mujer solitaria con gatos. Pero en los últimos años, a medida que las mujeres han empezado a usar sus Kindles y han encontrado espacios para conectar, han recuperado la palabra "obscenidad" y ahora la lucen con orgullo en sus productos, desde camisetas y tazas hasta marcapáginas que dicen "Estudiante de la Obscenidad" o "Amante de los Libros Picantes".

En resumen: Internet ha desestigmatizado rápida y ampliamente los romances de puertas abiertas, aunque los editores tradicionales todavía los ignoran rápidamente.

A la vanguardia de este crecimiento están las autoras, principalmente mujeres, que publican de forma independiente, conocidas coloquial y cariñosamente como “indies”.

Algunos de estos autores están recaudando grandes sumas, conquistando a una gran cantidad de fervientes seguidores y revolucionando el mundo literario tradicional. Mientras que los actores más convencionales de la industria editorial siguen haciendo el ridículo, estos autores independientes se ríen de sus ganancias y se llevan a los lectores con ellos.

Mientras los actores más convencionales de la industria editorial siguen haciendo el ridículo, estos autores independientes se ríen mientras llegan al banco... y se llevan a los lectores con ellos.

Las finanzas de Smut

A medida que el romance de puertas abiertas ha pasado de ser considerado un “tabú” a estar de moda, el auge de las plataformas digitales y la autoedición ha hecho posible que escritores y lectores creen y disfruten lo que aman, sin barreras.

Alessa Thorn es una autora de novelas románticas paranormales y urbanas que ofrece contenido abierto en todas sus novelas. Thorn ha publicado más de 30 libros desde que comenzó su carrera durante la pandemia, ha acumulado millones de lecturas (una métrica de ebooks en la plataforma KDP de Amazon) y miles de reseñas positivas. Además, es completamente autopublicada.

“El auge de la autopublicación impulsó el auge del género”, afirma. “Antes, había muy pocas editoriales interesadas en publicar novelas románticas explícitas. Géneros románticos como el erótico o incluso el paranormal apenas eran reconocidos por la industria. La autopublicación brindó a escritores y lectores del género un espacio para crear el suyo propio, y ha demostrado una y otra vez el ávido interés de los lectores por este tipo de libros”.

Thorn es ahora una autora independiente a tiempo completo, tan solo unos años después de iniciar su carrera. Atribuye la mayor parte de sus ingresos a las ventas de libros autopublicados y al mercado de libros electrónicos, y también utiliza la plataforma de autor Ream para publicar seriales.

De manera similar, C. Rochelle , una popular autora de ciencia ficción y romance paranormal, atribuye su carrera enteramente a las plataformas digitales.

“Personalmente, ¡me han permitido publicar!”, dice Rochelle. “Mi abuelo murió con carpetas de cuentos inéditos porque no consiguió que ningún editor se animara. He visto a mi marido intentar conseguir un agente durante años. No vi la necesidad de esperar a que alguien más considerara mis historias dignas”.

Mi abuelo murió con carpetas de cuentos inéditos porque no consiguió que ningún editor se animara. He visto a mi marido intentar conseguir un agente durante años. No vi la necesidad de esperar a que alguien más considerara mis historias dignas.

Luchando contra el estigma

Aunque muchos lectores y escritores han estado recuperando la palabra “obscenidad”, parte del viejo estigma aún persiste.

Los autores han sido blanco de campañas de desprestigio y odio, y algunos "defensores del romance limpio" tergiversan intencionalmente los libros de romance abierto y afirman falsamente que contienen contenido ilegal. Karina Halle , autora de romances explícitos superventas del USA Today , fue atacada recientemente en redes sociales.

Usuarios furiosos promocionaron falsamente uno de sus libros como "libro pedófilo" para conseguir que lo prohibieran y que Halle fuera "cancelada". La comunidad literaria en general apoyó ampliamente a Halle, ya que las acusaciones eran manifiestamente inexactas, pero el daño causado fue suficiente, y Halle se vio obligada a contactar a su abogado.

Casi todos los autores que escriben novelas románticas de puertas abiertas se han topado con este tipo de estigma con distintos niveles de severidad.

Thorn señaló que, si bien la industria ha cambiado con los años y la pornografía se ha vuelto más abiertamente aceptable, ser autoeditor en cualquier género aún está estigmatizado. "Aprendí a tomarlo a broma porque entiendo que quienes la critican rara vez tienen idea de lo que es".

Aunque muchos lectores y escritores han estado recuperando la palabra “obscenidad”, parte del viejo estigma aún persiste.

El cociente femenino

Sobre todo, el romance de puertas abiertas es un género editorial floreciente, dominado por mujeres. Al igual que muchas carreras y ocupaciones femeninas, estas historias se enfrentan a críticas desiguales en comparación con sus homólogos masculinos.

Muchas autoras que escriben novelas románticas paranormales o fantásticas con escenas de puertas abiertas son etiquetadas erróneamente como escritoras de "erótica". Si bien el género erótico no tiene nada de malo, no es lo mismo que la fantasía y el romance paranormal, y esta clasificación errónea, en última instancia, confunde a los lectores y afecta las carreras de las autoras. Por otro lado, George R. R. Martin nunca ha sido etiquetado erróneamente como escritor de erótica, a pesar de escribir novelas de fantasía con escenas de sexo explícito.

En otras palabras: cuando son mujeres las que están detrás de la pluma, el ámbito de su trabajo tiende a limitarse al contenido sexual.

“Uno de los mayores atractivos del género es que ofrece a las mujeres un espacio seguro para vivir sus fantasías y explorar”, dice Thorn. “Leer este tipo de historias puede ayudar a sanar el trauma causado por la cultura de la pureza, las malas parejas y el abuso sexual. Leer historias sobre mujeres que toman las riendas de su placer puede ser increíblemente empoderador”.

Rochelle señaló que el romance en sí mismo es un género empoderador. «Si le añades un toque picante —a veces explícito—, resulta revolucionario. Transmite un mensaje claro: autores y lectores pueden decidir la dinámica de sus relaciones, sus preferencias y su orientación sexual, en lugar de seguir las supuestas reglas y expectativas de una sociedad patriarcal y puritana».

Y estoy de acuerdo. Los lectores y escritores de romances de puertas abiertas están redefiniendo un legado de contenido explícito que se remonta a la antigüedad. Solo que esta vez, lo están redefiniendo a su imagen y rompiendo las expectativas de la sociedad, todo mientras ganan dinero y se divierten haciéndolo.

Los lectores y escritores de romances de puertas abiertas están redefiniendo un legado de contenido explícito que se remonta a la antigüedad. Solo que, esta vez, lo están redefiniendo a su imagen y rompiendo las expectativas de la sociedad, a la vez que ganan dinero y se divierten haciéndolo.

“No hay nada más aterrador para algunos que las mujeres que se empoderan sexualmente y comparten historias”, dijo Thorn.

Desde las solteronas clásicas y las mujeres solteras con gatos hasta los lectores Kindle de hoy, los escritores y lectores de novelas románticas siempre han sido radicales. No van a bajar el ritmo pronto, y las cifras de ventas lo demuestran.

Esté atento a este género durante los próximos años, ya que continúa evolucionando y defendiendo valores inclusivos radicales en nuestra sociedad: la puerta está abierta, después de todo.

diciembre 30, 2025 3 lectura mínima

It’s Freewrite’s favorite time of year. When dictionaries around the world examine language use of the previous year and select a “Word of the Year.”

Of course, there are many different dictionaries in use in the English language, and they all have different ideas about what word was the most influential or saw the most growth in the previous year. They individually review new slang and culturally relevant vocabulary, examine spikes or dips in usage, and pour over internet trend data.

Let’s see what some of the biggest dictionaries decided for 2025. And read to the end for a chance to submit your own Word of the Year — and win a Freewrite gift card.

[SUBMIT YOUR WORD OF THE YEAR]


Merriam-Webster: "slop"

Merriam-Webster chose "slop" as its Word of the Year for 2025 to describe "all that stuff dumped on our screens, captured in just four letters."

The dictionary lists "absurd videos, off-kilter advertising images, cheesy propaganda, fake news that looks pretty real, junky AI-written books, 'workslop' reports that waste coworkers’ time … and lots of talking cats" as examples of slop.

The original sense of the word "slop" from the 1700s was “soft mud” and eventually evolved to mean "food waste" and "rubbish." 2025 linked the term to AI, and the rest is history.

Honorable mentions: conclave, gerrymander, touch grass, performative, tariff, 67.

Dictionary.com: "67"

The team at Dictionary.com likes to pick a word that serves as “a linguistic time capsule, reflecting social trends and global events that defined the year.”

For 2025, they decided that “word” was actually a number. Or two numbers, to be exact.

If you’re an old, like me, and don’t know many school-age children, you may not have heard “67” in use. (Note that this is not “sixty-seven,” but “six, seven.”)

Dictionary.com claims the origin of “67” is a song called “Doot Doot (6 7)” by Skrilla, quickly made infamous by viral TikTok videos, most notably featuring a child who will for the rest of his life be known as the “6-7 Kid.” But according to my nine-year-old cousin, the origins of something so mystical can’t ever truly be known.

(My third grade expert also demonstrated the accompanying signature hand gesture, where you place both hands palms up and alternately move up and down.)

And if you happen to find yourself in a fourth-grade classroom, watch your mouth, because there’s a good chance this term has been banned for the teacher’s sanity.

Annoyed yet? Don’t be. As Dictionary.com points out, 6-7 is a rather delightful example at how fast language can develop as a new generation joins the conversation.

Dictionary.com honorable mentions: agentic, aura farming, broligarchy, clanker, Gen Z stare, kiss cam, overtourism, tariff, tradwife.

Oxford Dictionary: "rage bait"

With input from more than 30,000 users and expert analysis, Oxford Dictionary chose "rage bait" for their word of the year.

Specifically, the dictionary pointed to 2025’s news cycle, online manipulation tactics, and growing awareness of where we spend our time and attention online.

While closely paralleling its etymological cousin "clickbait," rage bait more specifically denotes content that evokes anger, discord, or polarization.

Oxford's experts report that use of the term has tripled in the last 12 months.

Oxford Dictionary's honorable mentions:aura farming, biohack.

Cambridge Dictionary: "parasocial"

The Cambridge Dictionary examined a sustained trend of increased searches to choose "parasocial" as its Word of the Year.

Believe it or not, this term was coined by sociologists in 1956, combining “social” with the Greek-derived prefix para-, which in this case means “similar to or parallel to, but separate from.”

But interest in and use of the term exploded this year, finally moving from a mainly academic context to the mainstream.

Cambridge Dictionary's honorable mentions: slop, delulu, skibidi, tradwife

Freewrite: TBD

This year, the Freewrite Fam is picking our own Word of the Year.

Click below to submit what you think the Word of 2025 should be, and we'll pick one submission to receive a Freewrite gift card.

[SUBMIT HERE] 

--

Sources

diciembre 18, 2025 5 lectura mínima

¿Qué pueden enseñar las cartas personales de Jane Austen a los escritores?

diciembre 10, 2025 6 lectura mínima

Singer-songwriter Abner James finds his creativity in the quiet freedom of analog tools. Learn how his creative process transcends different media.

Abner James went to school for film directing. But the success of the band he and his brother formed together, Eighty Ninety, knocked him onto a different trajectory.

The band has accrued more than 40 million streams since the release of their debut EP “Elizabeth," and their work was even co-signed by Taylor Swift when the singer added Eighty Ninety to her playlist "Songs Taylor Loves.”

Now, Abner is returning to long-form writing in addition to songwriting, and with a change in media comes an examination of the creative process. We sat down to chat about what's the same — and what's different. 

ANNIE COSBY: Tell us about your songwriting process.

ABNER JAMES: The way I tend to write my songs is hunched over a guitar and just seeing what comes. Sounds become words become shapes. It's a very physical process that is really about turning my brain off.

And one of the things that occurred to me when I was traveling, actually, was that I would love to be able to do that but from a writing perspective. What would happen if I sat down and approached writing in the same way that I approached music? In a more intuitive and free-form kind of way? What would that dig up?

AC: That's basically the ethos of Freewrite.

AJ: Yes. We had just put out a record, and I was thinking about how to get into writing for the next one. It occurred to me that regardless of how I started, I always finished on a screen. And I wondered: what's the acoustic guitar version of writing?

Where there's not blue light hitting me in the face. Even if I'm using my Notes app, it's the same thing. It really gets me into a different mindset.

 "I wondered: what's the acoustic guitar version of writing?"

I grew up playing piano. That was my first instrument. And I found an old typewriter at a thrift store, and I love it. It actually reminded me a lot of playing piano, the kind of physical, the feeling of it. And it was really fun, but pretty impractical, especially because I travel a fair amount.

And so I wondered, is there such a thing as a digital typewriter? And I googled it, and I found Freewrite.

AC: What about Freewrite helps you write?

AJ:I think, pragmatically, just the E Ink screen is a huge deal, because it doesn't exhaust me in the same way. And the idea of having a tool specifically set aside for the process is appealing in an aesthetic way but also a mental-emotional way. When it comes out, it's kind of like ... It's like having an office you work out of. It's just for that.

"The way I tend to write my songs is hunched over a guitar and just seeing what comes. Sounds become words become shapes. It's a very physical process that is really about turning my brain off."

And all of the pragmatic limitations — like you're not getting texts on it, and you're not doing all that stuff on the internet — that's really helpful, too. But just having the mindset....

When I pick up a guitar, or I sit down at the piano, it very much puts me into that space. Having a tool just for words does the same thing. I find that to be really cool and inspiring.

"When I pick up a guitar, or I sit down at the piano, it very much puts me into that space. Having a tool just for words does the same thing."

AC: So mentally it gets you ready for writing.

AJ: Yeah, and also, when you write a Microsoft Word, it looks so finished that it's hard to keep going. If every time I strummed a chord, I was hearing it back, mixed and mastered and produced...?

It's hard to stay in that space when I'm seeing it fully written out and formatted in, like, Times New Roman, looking all seriously back at me.

AC: I get that. I have terrible instincts to edit stuff over and over again and never finish a story.

AJ:  Also, the way you just open it and it's ready to go. So you don't have the stages of the computer turning on, that kind of puts this pressure, this tension on.

It's working at the edges in all these different ways that on their own could feel a little bit like it's not really necessary. All these amorphous things where you could look at it and be like, well, I don't really need any of those. But they add up to a critical mass that actually is significant.

And sometimes, if I want to bring it on a plane, I've found it's replaced reading for me. Rather than pick up a book or bring a book on the plane, I bring Traveler and just kind of hang out in that space and see if anything comes up.

I've found that it's kind of like writing songs on a different instrument, you get different styles of music that you wouldn't have otherwise. I've found that writing from words towards music, I get different kinds of songs than I have in the past, which has been interesting.

In that way, like sitting at a piano, you just write differently than you do on a guitar, or even a bass, because of the things those instruments tend to encourage or that they can do.

It feels almost like a little synthesizer, a different kind of instrument that has unlocked a different kind of approach for me.

"I've found that it's kind of like writing songs on a different instrument, you get different styles of music that you wouldn't have otherwise... [Traveler] feels almost like a little synthesizer, a different kind of instrument that has unlocked a different kind of approach for me."

AC: As someone who doesn't know the first thing about writing music, that's fascinating. It's all magic to me.

AJ: Yeah.

AC: What else are you interested in writing?

AJ: I went to school for film directing. That was kind of what I thought I was going to do. And then my brother and I started the band and that kind of happened first and knocked me onto a different track for a little while after college.

Growing up, though, writing was my way into everything. In directing, I wanted to be in control of the thing that I wrote. And in music, it was the same — the songwriting really feels like it came from that same place. And then the idea of writing longer form, like fiction, almost feels just like the next step from song to EP to album to novel.

For whatever reason, that started feeling like a challenge that would be deeply related to the kinds of work that we do in the studio.

AC: Do you have any advice for aspiring songwriters?

AJ: This sounds like a cliche, but it's totally true: whatever success that I've had as a songwriter — judge that for yourself — but whatever success I have had, has been directly proportional to just writing the song that I wanted to hear.

What I mean by that is, even if you're being coldly, cynically, late-stage capitalist about it, it's by far the most success I've had. The good news is that you don't have to choose. And in fact, when you start making those little compromises, or even begin to inch in that direction, it just doesn't work. So you can forget about it.

Just make music you want to hear. And that will be the music that resonates with most people.

I think there's a temptation to have an imaginary focus group in your head of like 500 people. But the problem is all those people are fake. They're not real. None of those people are actually real people. You're a focus group of one, you're one real person. There are more real people in that focus group than in the imaginary one.

And I just don't think that we're that different, in the end. So that would be my advice.

AC: That seems like generally great creative advice. Because fiction writers talk about that too, right? Do you write to market or do you write the book you want to read. Same thing. And that imaginary focus group has been debilitating for me. I have to silence that focus group before I can write.

AJ: Absolutely.

"I think there's a temptation to have an imaginary focus group in your head of like 500 people. But the problem is all those people are fake... You're a focus group of one, you're one real person. There are more real people in that focus group than in the imaginary one."

--

Learn more about Abner James, his brother, and their band, Eighty Ninety, on Instagram.