overlaylink

Comment j'ai (enfin) surmonté toute une vie de blocage d'écrivain

Reese Hopper
septembre 20, 2024 | 5 lire la lecture

Le 31 décembre 2021, j'ai publié mon 465e blog en 465 jours. J'ai réussi à écrire et publier un article chaque jour pendant une année civile entière, plus cent jours de plus.

Mais ça n'a pas toujours été comme ça. J'étais un lâcheur invétéré.

Tout a changé pour moi par accident. Quelques années avant de me lancer dans le blogging, en 2018, j'avais publié une photo sur Instagram avec la légende suivante : « Je pense bloguer tous les jours de novembre, quoi qu'il arrive. Tu crois que j'y arriverai ? »

Je ne m'en étais pas rendu compte à l'époque, mais cette publication Instagram idiote contenait tout ce dont j'avais besoin pour surmonter toute une vie de blocage d'écrivain et créer un système reproductible qui m'aide à exécuter des idées créatives.

Le problème

J’ai toujours été l’exemple classique d’un « homme à idées ».

Que des idées. Peu d'exécution. Aucune cohérence.

Voici comment ça se passait pour moi avant : une idée me frappe comme un éclair. L’inspiration me ronge jusqu’aux os. Je décide de poursuivre mon nouveau rêve chaque jour. Je crée donc pendant six ou sept jours. Puis, inévitablement, les difficultés surgissent. Une journée particulièrement chargée, ou le syndrome de la page blanche me frappe enfin, ou un collaborateur annule. Mon cerveau commence à croire que je me suis engagé dans une vie de difficultés sans aucun résultat positif.

Alors j'ai arrêté. C'était la seule conclusion logique !

Que se passait-il ici ?

Je ne définissais pas clairement mon acte créatif. Je prenais des engagements indéfinis. Je renégociais avec moi-même. Et je n'impliquais pas ma communauté.

L'accident

Lorsque j'ai partagé ma publication Instagram en 2018, je ne me suis pas rendu compte qu'elle contenait par hasard tous les éléments nécessaires pour surmonter mon manque de cohérence créative. Décryptons la légende : « Je pense bloguer tous les jours de novembre, quoi qu'il arrive. Tu crois que j'y arriverais ? »

Définitions claires

La première partie, « [Je] pense bloguer », était une définition essentielle de l'acte créatif. Remarquez que je n'ai pas dit « Je pense devenir écrivain ». Cela aurait été trop vague, trop audacieux pour être vrai. Mais j'avais déjà écrit des blogs. C'était facile, réalisable.

« Les plans définitifs et précis ont tendance à être mis en œuvre, tandis que les affirmations vagues s'évanouissent au vent », écrit l'auteur Donald Miller dans son livre Hero on a Mission. « Pourquoi ? Parce que les notions vagues et insaisissables ne nous aident pas à trouver une force narrative. »

Lorsque nous prenons de petits engagements quotidiens, notre capacité à démarrer et à maintenir une dynamique augmente.

Dates de fin définitives

La deuxième partie, « chaque jour de novembre », comportait une date de fin précise pour cette période créative. Au lieu de m'engager à vie dans un style de vie créatif dont je ne connaissais presque rien, je me suis fixé une date de fin précise. Même si les choses devenaient difficiles, je savais que je n'aurais pas à endurer éternellement des souffrances sans aucun bénéfice.

Kristen Berman, du Common Cents Lab, a constaté une augmentation de 24 % des candidatures lorsqu'elle fixait une date limite. D'autres chercheurs, du Journal of Marketing Research, ont découvert que 10 % des personnes utilisaient un chèque-cadeau de boulangerie valable deux mois, tandis que 30 % utilisaient le même chèque-cadeau valable seulement deux semaines !

Comment cela est-il logique ? Comment accomplir davantage avec moins de temps ? Quand on a beaucoup de temps, on procrastine. Des délais courts et des dates limites strictes augmentent notre rapidité d'exécution des projets et notre motivation à surmonter les obstacles.

Engagements non négociables

La troisième partie, « quoi qu'il arrive », était un engagement non négociable envers l'acte créatif. Peu importe que j'étais occupé ce jour-là. Peu importe que je manque d'inspiration, qu'une opportunité surgisse ou que le blog ne soit pas bon. Je devais publier de toute façon.

« Même si je ne me sens pas inspiré, j'ai besoin d'avancer », a déclaré Paulo Coelho, auteur de L'Alchimiste, lors d'une interview. « Je dis : "Toi, livre, tu te bats avec moi. D'accord. Je vais rester assis là et je ne te laisserai pas tranquille tant que je n'aurai pas trouvé la solution. »

Angela Duckworth, auteure du livre « Grit », a mis en lumière le point commun entre les diplômés de l'épuisante académie militaire de West Point. Ce n'était pas le QI, ni la taille ni la force physique, ni la formation antérieure. C'était le courage. Les diplômés s'identifiaient plus souvent à l'affirmation « Je termine tout ce que j'entreprends ».

En ne nous libérant pas de nos engagements à court terme et en surmontant les difficultés, nous sommes capables d'enchaîner des actes créatifs significatifs.

Engagements publics

Enfin, la dernière partie : « Pensez-vous que j’en sois capable ? » J’ai demandé à ma communauté ce qu’elle en pensait. J’ai présenté mon engagement au public. J’y ai misé une partie de ma réputation. Je n’étais plus un génie méconnu ni un artiste secret. J’ai fait une promesse au peuple !

« Je suis toujours à l'heure et je suis toujours présent aux rendez-vous, alors pourquoi ne pas faire pareil pour moi ? », a déclaré Mike Birbiglia, humoriste sur Netflix, lors d'une interview. « J'ai donc posé un mot manuscrit près de mon lit qui disait… “Mike ! Tu as un rendez-vous au Café Pedlar… à 7 h du matin avec ton esprit !” »

Les personnes fonctionnelles trouvent le moyen d'être présentes au travail, d'aller chercher leurs enfants et d'arriver à leurs rendez-vous, même lorsqu'elles n'en ont pas envie. Mais beaucoup d'entre nous peinent à tenir ces mêmes engagements envers eux-mêmes. En rendant public un engagement privé, nous augmentons les risques d'échec et, par conséquent, nos chances de réussite.

« Je suis toujours à l'heure et je suis toujours présent aux rendez-vous, alors pourquoi ne pas faire pareil pour moi-même ? » a déclaré Mike Birbiglia, humoriste sur Netflix, lors d'une interview. « J'ai donc posé un mot manuscrit à côté de mon lit qui disait… "Mike ! Tu as un rendez-vous au Café Pedlar… à 7 h du matin avec ton esprit !" »

Le processus

Si vous souhaitez démarrer votre propre processus créatif, suivez ce processus :

  1. Définissez un petit acte créatif que vous pouvez accomplir chaque jour. Idéalement, cela ne prend que 30 à 45 minutes.
  2. Engagez-vous sur une séquence à court terme avec une date de fin : 7, 15 ou 21 jours, c'est parfait !
  3. Quoi que vous fassiez, ne ratez pas une seule journée de votre série. Les jours où vous créez malgré tout, même sans inspiration, sont ceux où vous vous prouvez que vous pouvez surmonter le syndrome de la page blanche.
  4. Parlez de votre engagement envers la série à votre famille, vos amis et votre public. Partagez votre travail !
  5. Une fois votre série terminée, prenez le temps de réfléchir. Pensez à ce que vous avez aimé, à ce que vous avez appris et à la façon dont vous pouvez recommencer, mais plus longtemps.

À chaque création réussie, vous gagnerez en confiance. Vous surmonterez mieux le syndrome de la page blanche. Vous ferez du bon travail.

Mais surtout, vous passerez d'un créatif « en herbe » à un véritable créatif.

--

Sources

décembre 30, 2025 3 lire la lecture

It’s Freewrite’s favorite time of year. When dictionaries around the world examine language use of the previous year and select a “Word of the Year.”

Of course, there are many different dictionaries in use in the English language, and they all have different ideas about what word was the most influential or saw the most growth in the previous year. They individually review new slang and culturally relevant vocabulary, examine spikes or dips in usage, and pour over internet trend data.

Let’s see what some of the biggest dictionaries decided for 2025. And read to the end for a chance to submit your own Word of the Year — and win a Freewrite gift card.

[SUBMIT YOUR WORD OF THE YEAR]


Merriam-Webster: "slop"

Merriam-Webster chose "slop" as its Word of the Year for 2025 to describe "all that stuff dumped on our screens, captured in just four letters."

The dictionary lists "absurd videos, off-kilter advertising images, cheesy propaganda, fake news that looks pretty real, junky AI-written books, 'workslop' reports that waste coworkers’ time … and lots of talking cats" as examples of slop.

The original sense of the word "slop" from the 1700s was “soft mud” and eventually evolved to mean "food waste" and "rubbish." 2025 linked the term to AI, and the rest is history.

Honorable mentions: conclave, gerrymander, touch grass, performative, tariff, 67.

Dictionary.com: "67"

The team at Dictionary.com likes to pick a word that serves as “a linguistic time capsule, reflecting social trends and global events that defined the year.”

For 2025, they decided that “word” was actually a number. Or two numbers, to be exact.

If you’re an old, like me, and don’t know many school-age children, you may not have heard “67” in use. (Note that this is not “sixty-seven,” but “six, seven.”)

Dictionary.com claims the origin of “67” is a song called “Doot Doot (6 7)” by Skrilla, quickly made infamous by viral TikTok videos, most notably featuring a child who will for the rest of his life be known as the “6-7 Kid.” But according to my nine-year-old cousin, the origins of something so mystical can’t ever truly be known.

(My third grade expert also demonstrated the accompanying signature hand gesture, where you place both hands palms up and alternately move up and down.)

And if you happen to find yourself in a fourth-grade classroom, watch your mouth, because there’s a good chance this term has been banned for the teacher’s sanity.

Annoyed yet? Don’t be. As Dictionary.com points out, 6-7 is a rather delightful example at how fast language can develop as a new generation joins the conversation.

Dictionary.com honorable mentions: agentic, aura farming, broligarchy, clanker, Gen Z stare, kiss cam, overtourism, tariff, tradwife.

Oxford Dictionary: "rage bait"

With input from more than 30,000 users and expert analysis, Oxford Dictionary chose "rage bait" for their word of the year.

Specifically, the dictionary pointed to 2025’s news cycle, online manipulation tactics, and growing awareness of where we spend our time and attention online.

While closely paralleling its etymological cousin "clickbait," rage bait more specifically denotes content that evokes anger, discord, or polarization.

Oxford's experts report that use of the term has tripled in the last 12 months.

Oxford Dictionary's honorable mentions:aura farming, biohack.

Cambridge Dictionary: "parasocial"

The Cambridge Dictionary examined a sustained trend of increased searches to choose "parasocial" as its Word of the Year.

Believe it or not, this term was coined by sociologists in 1956, combining “social” with the Greek-derived prefix para-, which in this case means “similar to or parallel to, but separate from.”

But interest in and use of the term exploded this year, finally moving from a mainly academic context to the mainstream.

Cambridge Dictionary's honorable mentions: slop, delulu, skibidi, tradwife

Freewrite: TBD

This year, the Freewrite Fam is picking our own Word of the Year.

Click below to submit what you think the Word of 2025 should be, and we'll pick one submission to receive a Freewrite gift card.

[SUBMIT HERE] 

--

Sources

décembre 18, 2025 6 lire la lecture

Que peuvent apprendre les lettres personnelles de Jane Austen aux écrivains ?

décembre 10, 2025 6 lire la lecture

Singer-songwriter Abner James finds his creativity in the quiet freedom of analog tools. Learn how his creative process transcends different media.

Abner James went to school for film directing. But the success of the band he and his brother formed together, Eighty Ninety, knocked him onto a different trajectory.

The band has accrued more than 40 million streams since the release of their debut EP “Elizabeth," and their work was even co-signed by Taylor Swift when the singer added Eighty Ninety to her playlist "Songs Taylor Loves.”

Now, Abner is returning to long-form writing in addition to songwriting, and with a change in media comes an examination of the creative process. We sat down to chat about what's the same — and what's different. 

ANNIE COSBY: Tell us about your songwriting process.

ABNER JAMES: The way I tend to write my songs is hunched over a guitar and just seeing what comes. Sounds become words become shapes. It's a very physical process that is really about turning my brain off.

And one of the things that occurred to me when I was traveling, actually, was that I would love to be able to do that but from a writing perspective. What would happen if I sat down and approached writing in the same way that I approached music? In a more intuitive and free-form kind of way? What would that dig up?

AC: That's basically the ethos of Freewrite.

AJ: Yes. We had just put out a record, and I was thinking about how to get into writing for the next one. It occurred to me that regardless of how I started, I always finished on a screen. And I wondered: what's the acoustic guitar version of writing?

Where there's not blue light hitting me in the face. Even if I'm using my Notes app, it's the same thing. It really gets me into a different mindset.

 "I wondered: what's the acoustic guitar version of writing?"

I grew up playing piano. That was my first instrument. And I found an old typewriter at a thrift store, and I love it. It actually reminded me a lot of playing piano, the kind of physical, the feeling of it. And it was really fun, but pretty impractical, especially because I travel a fair amount.

And so I wondered, is there such a thing as a digital typewriter? And I googled it, and I found Freewrite.

AC: What about Freewrite helps you write?

AJ:I think, pragmatically, just the E Ink screen is a huge deal, because it doesn't exhaust me in the same way. And the idea of having a tool specifically set aside for the process is appealing in an aesthetic way but also a mental-emotional way. When it comes out, it's kind of like ... It's like having an office you work out of. It's just for that.

"The way I tend to write my songs is hunched over a guitar and just seeing what comes. Sounds become words become shapes. It's a very physical process that is really about turning my brain off."

And all of the pragmatic limitations — like you're not getting texts on it, and you're not doing all that stuff on the internet — that's really helpful, too. But just having the mindset....

When I pick up a guitar, or I sit down at the piano, it very much puts me into that space. Having a tool just for words does the same thing. I find that to be really cool and inspiring.

"When I pick up a guitar, or I sit down at the piano, it very much puts me into that space. Having a tool just for words does the same thing."

AC: So mentally it gets you ready for writing.

AJ: Yeah, and also, when you write a Microsoft Word, it looks so finished that it's hard to keep going. If every time I strummed a chord, I was hearing it back, mixed and mastered and produced...?

It's hard to stay in that space when I'm seeing it fully written out and formatted in, like, Times New Roman, looking all seriously back at me.

AC: I get that. I have terrible instincts to edit stuff over and over again and never finish a story.

AJ:  Also, the way you just open it and it's ready to go. So you don't have the stages of the computer turning on, that kind of puts this pressure, this tension on.

It's working at the edges in all these different ways that on their own could feel a little bit like it's not really necessary. All these amorphous things where you could look at it and be like, well, I don't really need any of those. But they add up to a critical mass that actually is significant.

And sometimes, if I want to bring it on a plane, I've found it's replaced reading for me. Rather than pick up a book or bring a book on the plane, I bring Traveler and just kind of hang out in that space and see if anything comes up.

I've found that it's kind of like writing songs on a different instrument, you get different styles of music that you wouldn't have otherwise. I've found that writing from words towards music, I get different kinds of songs than I have in the past, which has been interesting.

In that way, like sitting at a piano, you just write differently than you do on a guitar, or even a bass, because of the things those instruments tend to encourage or that they can do.

It feels almost like a little synthesizer, a different kind of instrument that has unlocked a different kind of approach for me.

"I've found that it's kind of like writing songs on a different instrument, you get different styles of music that you wouldn't have otherwise... [Traveler] feels almost like a little synthesizer, a different kind of instrument that has unlocked a different kind of approach for me."

AC: As someone who doesn't know the first thing about writing music, that's fascinating. It's all magic to me.

AJ: Yeah.

AC: What else are you interested in writing?

AJ: I went to school for film directing. That was kind of what I thought I was going to do. And then my brother and I started the band and that kind of happened first and knocked me onto a different track for a little while after college.

Growing up, though, writing was my way into everything. In directing, I wanted to be in control of the thing that I wrote. And in music, it was the same — the songwriting really feels like it came from that same place. And then the idea of writing longer form, like fiction, almost feels just like the next step from song to EP to album to novel.

For whatever reason, that started feeling like a challenge that would be deeply related to the kinds of work that we do in the studio.

AC: Do you have any advice for aspiring songwriters?

AJ: This sounds like a cliche, but it's totally true: whatever success that I've had as a songwriter — judge that for yourself — but whatever success I have had, has been directly proportional to just writing the song that I wanted to hear.

What I mean by that is, even if you're being coldly, cynically, late-stage capitalist about it, it's by far the most success I've had. The good news is that you don't have to choose. And in fact, when you start making those little compromises, or even begin to inch in that direction, it just doesn't work. So you can forget about it.

Just make music you want to hear. And that will be the music that resonates with most people.

I think there's a temptation to have an imaginary focus group in your head of like 500 people. But the problem is all those people are fake. They're not real. None of those people are actually real people. You're a focus group of one, you're one real person. There are more real people in that focus group than in the imaginary one.

And I just don't think that we're that different, in the end. So that would be my advice.

AC: That seems like generally great creative advice. Because fiction writers talk about that too, right? Do you write to market or do you write the book you want to read. Same thing. And that imaginary focus group has been debilitating for me. I have to silence that focus group before I can write.

AJ: Absolutely.

"I think there's a temptation to have an imaginary focus group in your head of like 500 people. But the problem is all those people are fake... You're a focus group of one, you're one real person. There are more real people in that focus group than in the imaginary one."

--

Learn more about Abner James, his brother, and their band, Eighty Ninety, on Instagram.